Book Title: Jainism in Buddhist Literature Author(s): Bhagchandra Jain Bhaskar Publisher: Alok PrakashanPage 93
________________ ( 74 ) Jainism. The use of the word Danda in the sense of Kamma can be seen in the Thananga (3. 126). The more important difference of opinion between the Buddha and Nigantha Nataputta relates to the relative ethical significance of deed, word and thought. Which is the most heinous of all deed, word or thought? The Buddha says that the most heinous is thought (manodanda) while Nigantha Nataputta is said to have held deed ( kayadanda) to be the worst. The reference in Upali Sutta of the Majjhima Nikaya to this dispute gives the impression that the Niganthas did not realise the importance of the mind or Manodanda. It is really not so and it needs further clarification. Nigaṇṭha Nataputta did not, at any stage, envisage bodily action which is devoid of intention and volition. Involuntary acts-such as mistakes and accidents do not fall within the purview of Kayadnda. Only such action as is preceded by thought is Kayadanda and the true significance of Nigantha Nataputta's attitude to threefold action can be conveyed when kayadaṇḍa is translated and understocd rot as mere bodily action but as "thought converted into action." Acarya Kundakunda condemned asceticism, if it is unaccompanied by intention ( bhava ). The guilt or otherwise of an action depends on the nature and intensity of thought and. intention. If ore is ever thinking of causing harm to another, he is guilty of malicious thought even though he does not actually cause any injury, while another, who, with no intention of causing any injury, becomes unconsciously the instrument of injury, should not be morally held responsible for that act. For instance, a burglar who fails in robbing after attempting to do so, is to be punished as a felon; and a surgeon, even though his patient may die during an operation skillfully performed with all attention, is not held responsible for such a death. But if any wrong is intentionally committed, he is, of course, more responsible and blamble for such "wrong" than he who merely harbours malicious thought but does not actually cause any injury:Page Navigation
1 ... 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326