________________
JUNE, 1910.)
ATPUR INSCRIPTION OF SAKTIKUMÁRA,
189
Serial No.
Rippur Inscription dated V.S. 1496
A.D. 1139.
Achalgadh Inscription dated V.8. 1942A.D. 1285.
II.
Chitorgadh Inscription dated V.S. 1337A.D. 1274.
III.
Åţapura Inscription, dated V.S. 1094
A.D. 977.
I.
IV.
Bappa
Bappa
Bappa
15 Khummaņa
Khummâņa
..Khummans
17 Allața ... 18 Naraváhana
Allaţa ... ... Naraváhana
.. Allata ... ..Naravábana
Khommaņa III. Bhartsipatta II married Mahalakshmi of the Rashtrakta family. Allața. V.S. 1008, 1010. Naraváhana, V.S. 1028. Hie queen was the daughter of the Chahumâna king Jejaya.
Salivahans. ... Saktikumâra, V.S. 1034.
20
Saktikumâra
... Saktikumâra
... Saktikumâra
1.-Guhila is the same as Guhadatta.
5.-Stla must be the same as Siladitya, of whom an inscription has been found at Samoli in the Bhůmat district, Mewar. It is dated V.S. 703= A.D. 646 (Prog. Rep., Archæol. Surv., Westerr Circle, for 1908-09, p. 48). The stone is now in the Ajmer Museum.
6.-This Aparajita is doubtless identical with the Guhilarâja Aparajita, whose inscription has been published by Prof. Kielborn in Ep. Ind., Vol. IV, p. 31. The stone is in the Victoria Hall, Udaipur.
12.-Simha is referred to in an inscription of V.S. 1335 as Sri-Ekalinga-Har-dradhana-Pasupatácharya-Haritardsi-kshatriya-Guhilaputra-[Sinha]-labdha-mahodayarn. The stone was originally found at Chitorgadh, but has now been removed to the Victoria Hall, Udaipur (Jour., Beng. As. Soc., Vol. IV, Pt. I, p. 48).
16-17.-Bhartripatta II's queen was Mahalakshmi of the Rashtrakota family, from whom sprang Allata. Both Allata and his mother are referred to in an inscription found in the temple of Saranesvar, near Udaipur. The inscription gives for him the two dates, V.S. 1008 and 1010 = A.D. 951 and 953 ( Bhavnagar Pr, and Sk. Inscrs., p. 68). Allata's wife was Hariyadevi, daughter of a Hûna prince.
18.-A record of Naravahana's reign has been found at Eklingji, dated V.S. 1028= A.D. 971 (Jour., Bomb. As. Soc., Vol. XXII, pp. 166-7). His queen was the daughter of Jejaya, of the Ch &humana dynasty.
20.-For Saktikumára the date V.S. 1084= A.D. 977 is furnished by the Atapura inscription. Two other inscriptions have been found apparently of his reign (Bhavnagar Pr. and Sk. Inscrs., p. 72 ; Professor Bendall's Journey, P. 82).
It will be seen that Lists I, II and III make Bappa the founder of the dynasty. But this is a mistake, which is excusable in such late records as those of the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries. Our inscription, which is the earliest that contains a genealogical list, distinctly makes Guhadatta or Gubila the progenitor of the dynasty. Again, the Eklingji inscription of Naraváhana says:
[
:
efter fefergfa: forfata [ ] "In this city), there flourished.Sri-Bappaka, lord of the earth, the gem of the surface of the earth and the moon among the kings of the family of Guhila."
