Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 29
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 183
________________ 86 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA [VOL. XXIX possibly means one enjoying a free holding. Pustakapāla was the record-keeper. The word kūjakolasa is difficult to explain. The village is said to have been granted together with the uddēša (space above the ground called tala), with subjects such as the weavers, gökūta (milkmen, called Gaura in Oriya) and saundika (vintners) and with gulmakas (outposts) at the kheta (village or hamlet), ghatta (barbour) and naditarasthāna (ferry). Another interesting passage says that the grant was made a-lēkhani.. pravēšatayā bhūmichchhidra-pidhāna-nyayēna. The expression a-lēkhani-pravēšatayā seems to mean that the grant would never in future have to be the subject of another document. That is to say that the village could not be regranted to any other family and that its ownership could not be transferred by the donee to some other family. In inscriptions we usually find the expression bhūmichchhidra-nyāya. This nyāya was based on the custom according to which a person who brought a piece of fallow or jungle land under cultivation for the first time was allowed to enjoy it as a rent-free holding. The word chhidra in this case no doubt refers to the furrowing of the land. But the idea of chhidra-pidhāna or' covering a hole' seems to have developed out of a misunderstanding of the original meaning of the nyāya. The idea in bhūmi-chchhidra-pidhāna-nyāya was probably that the loss of lands owing to various causes was thought to be compensated for by making free gifts of some of them. It may, however, also mean the custom relating to the reclamation of fallow land. Of the geographical names mentioned in the charter, the location of Dakshina-Tõsalā (i.e., "Tõsali) and Yamagartā-mandala has already been discussed. Guhēsvarapätaka, the capital of the Bhauma-Kara kings, was probably modern Jājpur or a locality in its suburbs. Tamura vishaya, Pachhama (Paschima) khanda, Sāntiragrāma and Kõmyösanga cannot be satisfactorily identified. The headquarters of Tamura may, however, be located at modern Tamur (21°18" N. 85°14" E.) in the former Pal-Lahara State. In regard to the name of the khanda, it may be pointed out that one of the Gañjām plates of Dandimahādēvi records the grant of a village in the Pūrva khanda of the Varadākhanda vishaya in the Köngöda mandala. This seems to suggest that the Pūrva and Paschima khandas were merely the eastern and western divisions of a vishaya. Dharmapātti, the native village of the donee, cannot be identified ; but Takāri, where his family originally lived, is known from numerous other records as a great seat of learned Brāhmaṇas. It was variously called Tarkari, Tarkarikā, Tarkāra, Takkära, Takäri and Takkārikā. Sometimes it is said to have been situated in the Madhyadēša division of India, which comprised, roughly speaking, the present Uttar Pradesh with the eastern part of the Panjab, although sometimes Bihar and North Bengal were included in the division. In one record the village is specifically described as situated within the limits of Srāvasti. There is, however, difference of opinion as regards the location of this Srāvasti. Some scholars favour its identification with Setmahet on the borders of the Gonda and Bahraich Districts of the Uttar Pradesh while others suggest its location about the Bogra District in North Bengal. But usually the former identification is supported by scholars and the village of Takāri is located in Oudh.' 1 See Jolly, Hindy Law and Custom (trans. by B. K. Ghosh), pp. 196-97. Note that the hunted deer belonged to him who hit it first. It is to be noted that the Vaijayanti explains bhūmichchhidr: asuncultivable land'. The expression is used in the Arthadastra of Kautilya exactly in the same sense. See Bhattacharya, Kamarupa-rasan-árali, p. 33, note. * See Misra, op. cit., p. 51. . Above, Vol. I, p. 336; Vol. III, pp. 348, 353 ; Vol. IX, p. 107; Ind. Ant., Vol. XVII, p. 118: Vol. XVI, pp. 204, 208. Ind. Ant., Vol. XVII, p. 118. . Above, Vol. XIII, pp. 290 ff.; of. Ind. Ant., Vol. XLVIII, p. 208 ; Vol. LX, pp. 14# History of Bengal, Vol. I (Dacca University), p. 579, noto.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432