Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 29
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 191
________________ 92 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA (VOL. XXIX these was the ruling king who issued the charter from his headquarters Kāñchipura. Its object is to record the gift of a village named Röyüru as a brahmadēya, to a Brāhmaṇa named Kumāramandaśarman who was well-versed in two Vēdas and constantly engaged in studies, by the king for the augmentation of his life, strength, victory and fortune. The donor is described as devoted to the feet of Bappa-bhattaraka. He is also called Paramabhägavata, Paramamähesvara and Paramabrahmanya. Judging from the genealogical account given above and palaeographical considerations indicated before, it is easy to identify the above-mentioned three kings with Mahēndravarman II, Paramēģvaravarman I and Narasimhavarman II respectively, of the Simhavishņu line. Our epigraph happens to be the only dated record of Narasimhavarinan II so far discovered. The date as cited herein is the twelfth year of the increasingly victorious reign of the king, Vaisakha, full-moon, lunar eclipse. These details, however, fall short for verification. For want of necessary data, the reign-period of this king also, like those of other rulers of this family, cannot be fixed with precision. Hence we are left to make what appears to be the most reasonable assumption on the strength of circumstantial evidence. The broad limits of Narasimhavarman II's reign are indicated by two inscriptions as follows. From the Gadvāl plates of the Western Chālukya king Vikramāditya I, dated in 674 A.C., which mention Narasimhavarman II's father Paramēśvaravarman I, we can postulate that the former succeeded his father some time after that date. Since Vikramaditya I who ruled from 565 to 680 A.C., had among his contemporaries, also Mahendravarman II and Narasimhavarman I,the father and grandfather of Paramēsvaravarman I, we are justified normally in believing that Paramēsvaravarman I was quite young by this time, i.e., 674 A.C., and that he occupied the Pallava throne at least for a decade or two after this date. Mr. N. Lakshminarayan Rao, has placed the first year of the reign of Paramēsvaravarman II, the son and successor of Narasimhavarman II, in 728-29 A.C. with the help of a stone inscription recently discovered by him at Ulchāla, near Kurnool. This is the outer limit. We may also observe that the Pallava ruler who exchanged embassies with the Chinese emperor in 720 A.C. has been identified with Narasimhavarman II. With these facts in view, we may examine the phenomenon of lunar eclipse which invests the above cited date with some definiteness. According to the Eclipses of the Moon in India, by Robert Sewell, the lunar eclipse occurred on the full-moon day of Vaišākha in the years 701, 702, 711 and 720 A.C., which fall within the approximate reignperiod of Narasimhavarman II. Of these the first two yield 690 or 691 A.C. as the first year of his reign. These perhaps would be too early, though there is no absurdity about them. Considering the long-range peaceful activities of this ruler, 720 A.C. which makes 709 A.C. his first year, may appear to be rather unsuitable. So we might pitch upon 711 A.C. as the date of our charter. This would show that his reign commenced in 700 A.C.' Of more than passing interest is the description, in our epigraph, of Paramēsvaravarman I as the performer of Asvamēdha and many other kratus, i.e., Vedic sacrifices. This leads us to an enquiry into the claim. Let us see how far it is justified. The Kuram grant of Paramēsvaravarman I bimself contains no reference to the performance of the horse sacrifice, and the other * We may as well connect these three epithets with Bappa-bhattaraka. The joint association of the first two terms with the same person here is noteworthy. * Above, Vol. X, pp. 100 ff. • Bom. Gaz., Vol. I, part II: genealogical statement facing p. 336. . Above, Vol. X, p. 101. Journal of Indian History, Vol. XXX, p. 291. • K. A. Nilakanta Sastri : Foreign Notices of South India, pp. 18 and 116-17. "It is interesting to note that Mr. Lakshminarayan Rao places his initial year circa 700 A.C. by approximation, J.I.H., Vol. XXX, p. 291.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432