Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 21
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 168
________________ No. 22.] SURAT PLATES OF KARKKARAJA SUVARNAVARSHA; SAKA 743. 137 historically important. The expression 'Gangaugha-santati-nirodha-vivriddha-kirlih' used in this verse to describe both Siva and Dhruvs clearly refers to Dhruva's victories over the Western Gängas and possibly also over the Palas and Gurjara Pratihāras. The expression can mean One whose fame is increased by the imprisonment of a scion of the Gänga family or lineage and would thus be referring to the imprisonment of the contemporary Gänga ruler Sivamāra, which is mentioned in several other records of the Rashtrakūtas. It is interesting to note that some of the Ganga records also admit indirectly the truth of the Rashtrakūta claim. The Manne plates, alleged to be issued by Sivamāra's son in 797 A.D., are no doubt spurious, but the statement made in them that Sivamira was entangled on all sides in difficulties seems to have been based on a genuine historic tradition. The Gattavādipur plates inform us that Sivamāra put his younger brother Vijayāditys upon the throne who like Bharata, knowing the earth to be his elder brother's wife, refrained from enjoying her.' This statement, especially the Rāmāyana episode recalled in the simile, makes it clear that Sivamāra was absent from the kingdom probably in the Rashtrakūta prison, and that his younger brother was trying to carry on the struggle against the conqueror in the absence of the de jure ruler. In the expression Gang-augha-santati-nirodhao I further see a reference to Dhruva's campaign in the Gangetic Doab, where according to the Sanjān and Baroda plates, he inflicted a crushing defeat on the Pāla and Gurjara armies. To the poet's imagination, the mighty forces of the Rashtrakūta invader, crossing the Ganges, may well have appeared to have repeated Siva's feat of obstructing the flow of the river. The next 6 verses (26-31) describe the exploits of the next ruler Govinda III, but the description is all conventional. The only historical event referred to is the rebellion of Stambha ; Govinda's brilliant campaigns against the kings of Southern and Northern India are altogether passed over. A verse in the Radhanpur plates of Govinda III states that he had opposed his father's plan of abdication in his favour, pointing out that he was quite content with the Kanchikä or necklace, the insignia of a Yuvarāja. The Kävi plates, however, distinctly state that Govinda obtained the kingdom from his father at a formal coronation. V. 30 of our record supports the Kävi plates, inasmuch as it refers to Govinda receiving, not his yauvarājya, but the imperial title rādhiraja-param esvaratā, from his father at the time of his own coronation. It is, therefore, difficult to say whether Dhruva had actually abdicated in the closing years or months of his reign. On the one hand it is possible that the expressions Räjyābhisheka-kalasuih and räjādhiraja-param ēsvaratām may have been used rather loosely by the Kävi and the present plates to denote yuvarājābhisheka, on the other hand, grown wiser by the treatment which he himself had given to his elder b:other Govinda II, Dhruva may have realised that installation as an heir-apparent was no guarantee against a war of succession and may, therefore, have actually abdicated in favour of his favourite son to avoid the chance of his succession being opposed. Under these circumstances it will be difficult to deoide in favour of either of the two alternatives until we get more evidence on the point. Vv. 32-40 refer to Amõgbavarsha I, his uncle Indra and the latter's son Karkka, the donor of the grant. All these verses are already known to us from other records, but v. 39 of this record combined with its date gives very valuable historical information. The verse in question tells us that Amöghava:sha I was reinstated on the throne by his cousin Karkka, when a number of Rashtrakūta feudatories had rebelled against him. The rebellion in question was already known, but when it started and how long it lasted we 12.9., Wal-Dindori plates, Ind. Ant., Vol. XI, p. 157. * Ep. Carn., Vol. IX, Nelamangala, No. 60. Ibid., Vol. XII, Nanjangud, No. 269. [I do not agree that any referenov to Dhruva's northern campaigns against the Pales and Gurjaras is also contained in the expression gång-augha.....kirti.-Ed.) . Ind. Ant., Vol. V, p. 147.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398