Book Title: Comparative Study Of Jaina Theories Of Reality And Knowledge
Author(s): Y J Padmarajaiah
Publisher: Jain Sahitya Vikas Mandal

Previous | Next

Page 192
________________ 172 JAINA THEORIES OF REALITY AND KNOWLEDGE the anekāntavādin, untruthful. Hence these two dosas also are inapplicable to the Jaina conception of reality. Arthakriyākāritvavāda Hitherto the various objects of the abhedavādin and the 1. With regard to the five doșas noticed on p. 146, f. n. 3, there is nothing strikingly new beyond what has already been given under the statement of the modus operandi by which being and non-being are synthesised in reality, as well as of the eight doşas hitherto dealt with. The refutation of fault No. 9, viz., pratiniyatavyavahāralopa, by virtue of which there would be, it is contended, a'chaos' in the order of things-a'chaos' in which a person proceeding to get water might get fire and vice versa-is contained in the statement of the modus operandi by which svatattva and paratattva are combined (supra, p. 149 ff.). In other words, water or fire has its own specific nature which is distinguishable from everything else. Were it not so, chaos would certainly break out among things as well as in our cognitions of them (cf. TRD, p. 236). Reference has already been made to the overlapping character of the refutations of the various dosas on p. 146, f. n. 3, and p. 163, f.n. 1. This is particularly evident in the case of the remaining four faults; viz., ubhaya (no. 12), pratyakşādipramāṇabādhā (no. 10), asambhava (no. 11) and abhāva (no. 13), which have also been noted in course of the same footnote. The answer to the charge of ubhayadosa would be, as already indicated, a variation of the answer to the charge of vyadhikaranatādosa. That is, just as bhāva and abhāva can reside in the same abode, so also oneness and manyness can. Similarly, the faulty notions of being contrary to all experience', 'impossibility', and 'non-existence' (the last two of these being the consequences of the first one), which have been brought under no. 10, no. 11 and no. 13 respectively, have been repudiated, in spirit if not in letter also, under the one or the other of the eight dosas, particularly under virodha, apratipatti and vişayavyavasthāhāni. Cf. TRD, p. 236.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446