Book Title: Comparative Study Of Jaina Theories Of Reality And Knowledge
Author(s): Y J Padmarajaiah
Publisher: Jain Sahitya Vikas Mandal

Previous | Next

Page 257
________________ CHAPTER VII 237 position which, if developed to its logical conclusion, will approach the Jaina viewpoint. This fact becomes particularly evident in the case of samāvaya which, as will be presently seen, is given up all but in name. The admission of svabhāvasambandha' or svarūpasambandha', the ‘natural' or the ‘simple' relation, offers the thin end of the wedge in dispensing with relation as a tertiary entity in a relational situation. This notion of svarūpasambandha connotes that the terms themselves contain, within their nature, the relational trait which is as objectively real as aici 1. Cf. JPN, p. 232. 2. samjñāmātrena, na vastutathābhāvaḥ / STP, p. 704. Cf. śri Harsa's observation that the Naiyāyika regards the 'nature' of things also as their 'determinant' : svabhāvasyāpi bhavatā niyamakatvängikārāt / KKS, p. 1091. Chatterjee writes: "Unlike the relations of conjunction and inherence Svarūpasambandha is not distinct from the terms related by it. Rather, the relation is itself constituted by one of the relata....the relation is constituted by the object, or is due to the nature of the object.” NTN, p. 188. The distinction, in the Nyāya philosophy, between relation as a 'third unity' (an independent entity) and relation 'without a third relating unity' as Stcherbatsky renders it expresses the difference between 'separable conjunction' (samyoga) and inseparable conjunction' (samavāya) on the one hand, and the simple relation' (svabhāvasambandha) on the other. The former is found with the reality of the 'link' (anubhūyamāna sambandha, or vigrahavan sambandha) and the latter without the reality of the link' but yet objec tive. Cf. Log., Vol. II, f.n. 3, p. 287. 4. Cf. JPN, p. 232, and RML, pp. 153-154. Regarding the direct ness of the temporal and spatial relation, Ingalls writes : "Everything resides directly in time by a temporal relation. Time thus acts like space (dik) in that it is a substratum, for all entities.” NNLI, p. 78. 5. Just because relatedness is 'resident' in the relata, the ideal

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446