Book Title: Comparative Study Of Jaina Theories Of Reality And Knowledge
Author(s): Y J Padmarajaiah
Publisher: Jain Sahitya Vikas Mandal

Previous | Next

Page 280
________________ 260 JAINA THEORIES OF REALITY AND KNOWLEDGE Yaśovijaya distinguishes between the 'sahabhāvi', the simultaneous or the intrinsic aspect, and ‘kramabhāvi', the successive or the extrinsic aspect, of paryāya, and identifies guna with the former. He observes that each of the two names is a specific sign (višeşasamjñā) for its corresponding aspect and brings the two signs together under the generic sign (sāmānyasamiña) of paryāya. By thus treating guna as a kind of paryāya he is able to assert, with Divākara, that the twofold' framework of dravyästika and paryāyāstika is adequate to comprise the full content of reality. philosophy and terminology of Nyāya-Vaiseșika gradually gained over the scientific thoughts of the Hindus. For on the side of paryāya, of development or modification, there seems to be no room for an independent category 'quality'since paryāya is a state in which a thing, dravya, is at any moment of its existence, and this must, therefore, include qualities, as seems to be actually the view embodied in the oldest text." JSJ, Pt. II, p. xxxiv. He also refers to this view of paryāya as a "mark of antiquity" of Jainism. Whatever might be the date of the "ancient Jaina texts" or "Sūtras" in which the problem of paryaya has been treated, it is hard to think of Kundakunda's Pravacanasāda or Umāsvāti's Tattvärthādhigamasutra, works which mention regularly' the distinct category of guna, as comparatively modern books only'. It would, perhaps, be better to recognise that postulating the distinct category of guņa must have been done at a considerably early period, may be in the early centuries of the Christian era, posterior, of course, to the period when paryāya alone was accepted as the more inclusive category. This must have come about from the spontaneous perception of an obvious gap in the ontological picture of a dravya as well as from the "influence” of the Nyāya-Vaiśeşika philosophy as suggested by Jacobi and Upadhaye (see PrSKU, Intro., p. lxvii f.). 1. iti dravyaparyāyārthikabhedāddvaividhyameva / Vivsti on Yaso vijaya's Nyāyalokah (The śri Jaina Grantha Prakāśaka Sabha, Ahmedabad, vik. sam. 1974), p. 203. See also the early part

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446