Book Title: Sahrdayaloka Part 03
Author(s): Tapasvi Nandi
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 426
________________ Rasa-nispatti-vicāra in Mammata and Jagannātha 1601 is something to be relished after it is manifested through the agency of the determinants, etc. If it is asked, "where have you seen anything which is different from both the material and manifesting cause ?", (kāraka-jñāpakābhyām anyat kva drsam iti cet), the answer is, "this is seen nowhere." And not being ever seen anywhere is an adoration and not a blemish, for it proves the non-ordinary nature of rasa (a-laukikarva-siddher bhūsanam etat, na dūsanam). Rasa may be called to be "an effect" only metaphorically, as the process of relishing comes into being. After Abhinavagupta, M. further observes that Rasa may be spoken of as cognisable (pratyeyópi abhidhīyatām), as it is the object of extra-ordinary selfconsciousness, which is distinct in nature from (i) The empirical knowledge (laukika-pratyaksa), perceptual and the like, and also distinct from (ii) The knowledge of yogins in primary stage, which is possessed of analytic knowledge, i.e. from cognition without active participation (tāțasthya) of the thoughts of others, which is proper to the direct perception of the yogins, and is also, distinct from (iii) the perfect yogin's entirely self reposed experience, free from the contact of any object of cognition, i.e. perception of the yogins of the higher order. The mode of proof cognising it (tad-grāhakam ca pramānam) is not indeterminate (nirvikalpa) as it is characterised by the consideration of vibhāvā"di-s. It is not even determinate, = (sa-vikalpa) as rasa is being relished, and it abounds in extra-ordinary delight and is known to exist from its own consciousness (sva-samvedana-siddharvāt). The character of rasa-perception, consisting of the negation of both (i.e. determinate and indeterminate modes of proof), and yet being characterised by both, suggests as before, its extra-ordinariness, without any contradiction (-pūrvavallokottara-tām avagamayati, na tu virodham). This is the opion of Abhinavaguptapāda. M. follows him absolutely. Here ends M.'s analysis of the process of rasa-realization. We will now turn to Jagannātha (= J.) as all other leading authorities in this field of literary aesthetics have been throughly and individually covered by us in an earlier chapter. Jagannātha also basically follows the view of Abhinavagupta but he has so many new things to report. We have observed earlier that J. has given a five-fold division of dhvani. Rasadhvani is one of the five types of dhvani. He observes : (pp. 64, Edn., Athavale ibid)-: "evam pañcā"tmake dhvanau parama-ramaniyatayā rasa-dhvanes tad ātmā rasas tāvad abhidhiyate" Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676