________________
"Dasarūpaka-Vicāra"
1751 This is read exactly so in the śr. Pra, which also seems to follow the same, i.e Chow. Edn.; NS.
RS. - “Parikriyā tu bījasya bahulīkaraṇam matam.” (pp. 216, III. 33)
The RS. reads ‘parikarah' in the enumeration and reads 'parikriya' in the definition. This almost reads like the DR.
SD. "samutpannártha-bāhulyam jñeyah parikarah punah.” (VI. 83 pp. 360) This follows the NS. (Chow. Edn.), as read in the śr. Pra., & NLRK.,
(3) “Parinyāsaḥ" - is recognised by - NS., DR., Sp. Pra., N.D., BP., PR., NLRK., RS. & SD.
NS. - "tan nispattiḥ parinyāsaḥ” (XIX. 706, p. 39) DR. - "tan nispattiḥ parinyāsaḥ." (I. 27; pp. 21), This is from NS. śr. Pra, “tan nispattiḥ parinyāso vijñeyaḥ kavibhiḥ sadā.” (pp. 505, Ch. XII) This follows the NS., DR. ND. - "viniscayah parinyāsaḥ.” (I. 43; pp. 109) This is the same as above, termed differently. B.P. - "tan nispattiḥ parinyāsaḥ.” (pp. 208, live 13) This follows the NS., DR. PR. “bīja-nişpattiḥ parinyāsaḥ." (pp. 78) NLRK. - "tanniņpattiḥ parinyāso vijñeyaḥ kavibhiḥ sadā.” (Kā. 73, pp. 58) This is NS., Śr: Pra., etc. RS. - "bīja-nişpatti-kathanam parinyāsa itīryate.” (III. 33; pp. 217) ‘kathnam' is added and explained in the illustrations. SD. - 'tannispattiḥ parinyāsaḥ.” (VI. 83, pp. 361; This is NS.)
(4) Vilobhana - is recognised by NS., DR., Śr. Pra., ND., BP., PR., NLRK., RS., & SD.
NS. "guņa-nirvarnanam caiva vilobhanam iti smệtam." (XIX. 71, pp. 39) DR. - "guņā”khyānād vilobhanam” (1. 27; pp. 21) This is almost the NS. Śr. Pra. - "guna-nirvarnanam caiva vilobhanam iti smstam.” (pp. 506, Ch. XII.) This follows the NS.
Jain Education International
For Personal & Private Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
