Book Title: Sahrdayaloka Part 03
Author(s): Tapasvi Nandi
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 533
________________ 1708 SAHRDAYĀLOKA never suggests that patākā and prakari are inevitable in a play, though of course, they occur only after bīja and bindu, which is absolutely naturel. So, when Dr. Kulkarni observes in the foot-note while giving yet another quotation from the Abh.. that "Here Abhinava appears to nod”, we mean that Abhinavagupta accepts the sequence of artha-prakrtis but not the inevitableness of all of them. i.e. specially of patākā and prakari. The other reference reads as : (A.bh. Vol. III. p. 16, on NS. XIX 26, 27) : "na sarvatra prārambhādivat sarvā artha-prakstayo'pi. api tu yasya nāyakasya yenā'rtha-praksti-viśeşena prayojana-sampattir adhikā'dhikā, tad eva pradhānam; anyat tu bhavad api gunabhūtam a-satkalpam, yathā sva-parākramabahumāna-śālinām patākā-prakaryaū a-vivaksite eva. bīja-bindu-kāryāni tu sarvatra anapāyīni. tatrā'pi tu guna-pradhana-bhāvah.” So, we again assert that nowhere Abhinavagunta nor even Bharata, has given even a semblance to believe that for either of them a sandhi meant a sum total of artha-prakrti-s and avasthās. Our understanding is that even the sequence or order with reference to both patākā and prakarī is also not fixed. Bharata and others following him mention patākā first and prakarī next only because they want to suggest that patākā goes a longer way in the main theme and prakarī occupies only a shorter space. No sequence is meant; for we feel prakarī as in case of Jatāyu episode, can preceed a patākā and there may be only prakari and not parākā if the poet so chooses. But misguided as Dhananjaya was by the term “yathā-vidhi” in the NS., Dr. Kulkarni observes, that naturally he (i.e. Dhananjaya) evolves the doctrine that each sandhi rests on an avasthā and an artha-praksti. Dr. Kulkarni observes, and we fully agree with it, that this docrine does not stand to reason, for as pointed out by the Abh. and the ND., the patākā or prakarī, or both of them, are not indispensable elements in the Nātaka if the hero is capable of attaining the object of desire without external help. Even in the absence of patākā and the prakarī we do find all the five sandhis in the drama. The definitions of the five sandhi-s as given by the NS. show that the five respective sandhi-s essentially rest on the five respective avasthā-s and the progressive development of the bīja. The DR. too, is aware of this fact, when it says that patākā may or may not occur in the garbha sandhi - "garbhas-tu... patākā syān na vā syāt prāpti-sambhavah.” Dr. Kulkarni points out in his foot-note (No. 27, pp. 84) that Haas is wrong when he translates : "(In it) there should be an Episode (patākā) or (else) there should not be prospect of success (prāpti-sambhava-prāptyāśā).” What the DR. means is this : In the garbha the patākā may or may not occur but the prospect of success - the third avastha shall occur. It may be noted that the ND. is very clear about this and observes, Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676