Book Title: Sahrdayaloka Part 03
Author(s): Tapasvi Nandi
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 529
________________ 1704 SAHĶDAYĀLOKA These 21 sandhyantara-s or special junctures occur between the various junctures. Bhoja (pp. 498, Śr. Pra. Vol. II, Edn. Josyer) reads as : atha sandhyantarāny ekavimšatih tad-yathā-sāma, bhedah dandah, pradanam, vadhah, pratyutpannamatitvam, gotra-skhalitam, sāhasam, bhayam, hrih, māyā, krodha, ojah, samvaranam, bhrāntih, hetvavadhāranam, dūtah, lekhah, svapnah, citram, madah iti. All these are illustrated fully (pp. 499-503, ibid). Regarding 'krodha' (pp. 501, ibid) - Bhoja observes - "yo'sau purusārtha-siddhi-hetuh krodha-sthayibhāvah, soyam na bhavati ity udāhrtam, puruşārtha-siddhi-hetus tu sthāyibhāvo na sandhyantaram.” Dr. Raghavan here observes (pp. 593, ibid) - "It is correct to say that the Krodha here meant as a sandhyantara is a fleeting vyabhicārin; yet it is all the same a bhāva, and Bhoja's argument can not be pressed further. That apart, we must be indebted, in untold measure, to Bhoja for such things as the sandhyantara-s, not because these by themselves are of great value, but because these are responsible for immensely valuable quotations from such rare and now lost dramatic masterpieces as the Devicandragupta, and the Abhisārikā-vañcitaka of Viśākhadeva and the Pārtha-vijaya of Trilocana. The enumeration and illustration of these 21 sandhyantaras run from p. 480 to p. 487 (number is different in Josyer Edn. as noted above). The names of these sandhyantara-s in the list of the Kaśī Edn. are, some of them, wrong. After Sahasa in XXI. 50 the vadha must be bhaya; in the same verse, Hirvāvadhāranam must be Hetvāvadhāranam. The list in K.M. Edn., foot-note is purer, except in the case of the last sandhyantara which is given as mada correctly in the Kāśī Edn., but wrongly as 'Manda' in the K.M. text.” Dr. Raghavan has done some proof-reading here. But as we see it, the list in Dr. Unni's edn. is very pure. The RS. has inherited this concept from not only Bhoia and Dhananjaya but also from Bharata. A recension containing this topic could have been available to Singa Bhūpāla. The RS. further notes that the sandhyanga-s go with the sandhi-s, but these 21 sandhyantaras are presented without consideration of any sandhi. The RS. criticises the stand of the DR. in merging these under sandhi-s, because these are not a regular feature. The RS. (pp. 247, Kā. III. 92-96, read as - "udbhāva-kalpanā'ngānām mukha-pramukha-sandhisu. 92b Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676