Book Title: Critical Study Of Paumacariyam
Author(s): K R Chandra
Publisher: Research Institute of Prakrit Jainology and Ahimsa

Previous | Next

Page 290
________________ SOURCES, CONTRIBUTICN AND INFLUENCE OF PCV. 261 only that but even the Ramopākhyāna and the first chapter of the Balakānda of VR itself (i.e. Adi Rāmāyana) refer to one boon only and Kaikeyi demands two things on the strength of that single boon (See Supra, Ch. 3 Sec. B). The PCV mentions that Bharata's mother did not demand Rama's exile. It is supported by the Dasaratha Jataka and Dasaratha Kathanam (See Supra, Ch. 3 Sec. 3B). The PCV mentions that Rāma preferred a voluntary exile. It is supported by the Anāmakam Jätaka (See Supra, Ch. 3 Sec. 3B). The PCV does not mention any definite period of Rāma's exile. It is supported by the Anāmakam Jātaka. Even in the Ramopākhyāna, Kaikeyi does not mention definite period of Rama's exile (MB, 3.277. 26). It is at Lankā that the spirit of Dasaratha asks Rāma to return to Ayodhyā as the period of fourteen years has completed (MB, 3.291 29) (See Supra, Ch. 3 Sec. 3B). The PCV unlike the VR does not refer to any spying work by Rāvana's men. It is held that even in the VR it is a spurious portion (Bulcke, p. 380). The severing of the head of imaginary Rāma, the duel between Rāvana and Sugrīva before the commencement of the battle are not mentioned in the PCV. The same is the case with the Ramopakhyāna It is held that these two episodes did not form part of the Adi Rāmāyana also. They are later interpolations (Bulcke, p. 380; See Supra, Ch. 3 Sec. 8 A). In the PCV Rāma is said to have lived for 17000 years while in the VR for 11000 years. But the Dasaratha Jātaka mentions that Rāma lived for 16000 years. Thus the reference in the PCV is to some extent supported by the old tradition (See Supra, Ch. 3 Sec. 9. E. V). The PCV refers to Hanumat's wives. In the whole of the VR there is no mention that Hanumat was married. But at one place it is said that Bharata offered 16 girls to Hanumat in marriage (VR, 6. 1 26. 44). Thus the account in the PCV has some traditional basis. According to the PCV Hanumat, a Vánara scion was the son-in-law of Sugrīva as well as of Rāvana's sister. The Vanaras and the Raksasas formed two branches of the Vidyadhara lineage. In the VR there is no such reference but some scattered references in the VR and the Mahābhārata reveal that Sugrīva and Rāvana were filially related (See Infra, Vānaras under Ch. 10),

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672