Apbhramsa of Hemchandracharya

Author(s): Hemchandracharya, Kantilal Baldevram Vyas, Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani
Publisher: Prakrit Text Society Ahmedabad

Page 130

(101)
Here सबधु (< शपथ ) is an illustration of प> ब, थ >ध; afa (< ffera) of > , a><; 797355 (<9 ) of % > 97.
What is the implication of ) (the condition ) noninitial' ( 3418t) (in the sūtra )? (For instance, vide ) Hamrou where initial) – does not change to 17. What is (also the significance of the condition) following a vowel' ( FIRIE) (in the sūtra ) ? (Vide) files fitte te (where are following immediately an anunāsika does not change to 1). What is the significance of the condition)
non-conjunct' (ayah) in the sūtra ? (Vide) verf Baterieră arau (sūtra 357. 2) (where being a member of a conjunct does not change to l). By the all-embracing condition (
3 17 ) that all the changes are (not exclusive, but) only general, occasionally they do not take place. e. g. (4) af rafa sina foi, (afe ) oca BTTÀI
पानीयं नवे शरावे यथा सर्वाङ्गेण प्रवेक्ष्यामि ॥ “It ever (lit. 'soinehow )' I ( happen to ) meet my beloved, I will work an unheard of miracle : as water permeates a fresh earthern dish so shall I enter (my love) with all my being."
Pischel translates the above vs. : “If I meet my lover somewhere, should I have my desire unfulfilled ? As water in a new, i. e. unburnt pot I shall be completely absorbed in him."
Pischel's rendering of the first caraṇa is evidently faulty. Alsdorf corrects it as : “If I were to get my lover somewhere then I shall commit an unheard of strangeness (the one that is described in the next line).” 1 1 Alsdorf, op. cit., p. 82.