Book Title: Traverses on Less Trodden Path of Indian Philosophy and Religion
Author(s): Yajneshwar S Shastri
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 135
________________ 13 CONCEPTION OF NIRVANA IN ASANGA'S VIJNANAVADA BUDDHISM The conception of Nirvana or liberation is the greatest original contribution of Indian philosophy to the world thought. This is the gate-way shown by the Indian sages to the suffering mankind to become free from all kinds of miseries, passions, and ignorance, realising one's own real nature or Self. All the systems of Indian philosophy except Carvāka considered moksa as the highest value, the summum bonum of human life. To attain this Liberation or to become free from the clutches of ignorance, sufferings and passions, Indian sages and thinkers have enumerated and emphasised different paths based on their spiritual experience. Describing the nature of Nirvāṇa or mokṣa the different schools of philosophy may differ from one another but the ultimate goal is liberation or freedom from bondage. The world 'Nirvana' itself seems to be the original contribution of Buddhists to Indian philosophy because this word does not appear in the major Upanisads. Describing the nature of Nirvana, especially Buddhism differs from the other schools of thought, but at the ultimate point of view, there is not much difference between them. It is, for all, becoming free from the clutches of ignorance, pain and attachment, even though it is indescribable in human terms. Describiag the nature of Nirvana even Buddhist schools differ from one another. Hinayanists think that Nirvāṇa is something existent, full of peace and beyond misery. It can be attained realising pudgalanairatmya (i e. realising self or ego to be non-existent which is the real cause of pain and passion). Removing the klesavaraṇa is enough for attaining the Nirvana. But Mahayanists hold that Nirvana is not something to be achieved; it is realising the true natura of things. It is indescribable and beyond categories of intellect. Therefore, it cannot be said to be either existent or non-existent. Simply realising the pudgalanairatmya is not enough for realising the Nirvana but realising the dharmanairatmya is also essential. Removing both the klesavarana and jħeyavaraṇa, one can know the real nature of Nirvana. Nagarjuna, being an absolutist, severely criticises the Hinayānist's conception of Nirvana. It cannot be said to be existent or non-existent. It is beyond all categories of thought. Really it cannot be defined. It is non-dual. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302