Book Title: Studies In Umasvati And His Tattvartha Sutra
Author(s): G C Tripathi, Ashokkumar Singh
Publisher: Bhogilal Laherchand Institute of Indology

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 29
________________ The Works of Vācaka Umāsvāti 19 975-1000) on the Sanmati-prakarana of Siddhasena Divākara. Siddhasena, in the next step of development, envisaged these two facets of omniscience as unitary and advocated the ekopayogavāda. (I forego citing the particulars on sources since not very directly relevant to the present paper.) 26. Beginning from Agastyasimha's cūrni (late 6th century AD) to the late medieval period, the scores of Svetāmbara commentaries of various descriptions—cūrnis, vrttis, and īkās (the last two in Sanskrit) etc. on the āgamas as well as those on the dārśanika prakaranas, continue quoting from Umāsvāti's Sabhāsya-Tattvārthādhigama-sūtra and next from the Praśamarati-prakarana, and to a lesser degree from his other compositions alluded to in this paper. The Digambara Church also quoted from its own version of the Tattvārthādhigama (the Tattvārtha-sūtra), and which it ascribes to an unknow' Nirgrantha ācārya (Devanandi, c. AD 635-680), or author unspecified (Akalankadeva, c. mid 8th cent. AD), or to Grddhapicchācārya (Vīrasena AD 816, Vidyānanda AD 900-950, Pampa AD 941, Vādirāja AD 1025, Koppal Inscription AD 1060, Hunasi Hadagali Ins. AD 1098, and Jayasena twelfth century); or to Aryyadeva (Humbaca Ins. AD 1075), or to Umāsvāti alias Gțddhapicchācārya (Śravana Belagola inscriptions beginning from ad 1115 or even to Umāsvāmī, early sixteenth century AD). The Praśamarati-prakarana is nowhere mentioned in the Digambara literature but a quotation therefrom (of its kārikā 25) appears in the Jayadhavalā (c. AD 817) according to Pt. Nathooram Premi (but the date there he gives for it is the Dhavalāīkā): (Vide his 'Umāsvāti-kā sabhāsya Tattvārtha', Jaina Itihāsa aur Sāhitya [Hindi], Bombay 1956, p. 526). The quotation under reference is as following: Krodhāt prīti-vināśam mānād-vinayopaghātam-āpnoti/ śāhyāt pratyaya-hānih sarva-guna-vināśanam lobhāt//25// (Virasena, in that context, simply prefixes the phrase 'Atropayogi ślokah', mentioning neither the source, nor citing the author's name.) It is not clear whether Virasena used the original work of Umāsvāti, or is requoting from some Yāpanīya commentary before him in which it may have figured. 27. The greatest benefit of Umāsvāti's Tattvārtha-sūtra (Dig. version) (along with the Sanmati-prakarana of Siddhasena) was taken by the pre-medieval and medieval learned writers of the Digambara sect who adroitly used the former's advancements and organizational

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 ... 300