Book Title: Illuminator of Jaina Tenets
Author(s): Tulsi Acharya
Publisher: Jain Vishva Bharati

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 19
________________ INTRODUCTION xvii exclusion of kāla from the category of astikāya because it has neither pradeśas nor parts. A material atom (paramānu) is also conceived as possessed of parts, inasmuch as it has taste, smell, colour, and touch which are conceived as its parts in the scriptural tradition; a material atom has indeed no physical parts (dravyāvayava), but it has indeed logically intelligible parts (bhāvāvayava). In this connection it is necessary to explain the nature of a pradeśa with reference to the substances. The jiva, dharma, adharma and lokākāśa (cosmic space) have each an equal number of pradeśas which are numerically innumerable. Now the problem is-how can a jīva which has different magnitudes co-extensive with the body that it might happen to occupy have the same number of pradeśas as that in the dharmästi. kāya or adharmästikāya that spread over the whole of the cosmic space? The Jaina conception of pradeśa explains the problem. A pradeśa has dimensions, and a standard pradeśa is the pradeśa of dharmästikāya, adharmāstikāya or ākāśāstikāya. Thus the cosmic ākāśa is conceived as having an innumerable number of pradeśas. In other words, the dimension of a standard pradeśa is the volume of the cosmic ākāśa divided by an innumerable number. This is about the standard pradeśa. The pradeśa of the soul (which, according to Jainism, has demensions) is, however subject to contraction and expansion. The soul is neither atomic nor ubiquitous in size according to Jainism. A pradeśa of a soul in its maximum expansion is coextensive with the standard pradeśa of dharmāstikāya, adharmāstikāya and ākāśa. The dimensions of the soul, however, vary in accordance with the dimensions of the body it might happen to occupy, but the number of its pradeśas remains fixed, being innumerable in number, there being only contraction and expansion of the pradeśas according to necessity. The upshot is that a pradeśa of Jaina philosophers is not like the Euclidean point that has no dimension. It is perhaps comparable to the 1 Ibid., p. 316: kāyagrahaņam pradeśāvayava-bahutvärtham addhāsamayaprati şedhārtham ca. 2 Ibid., pp. 318-9 : nanu caiko'pi parmānuh pudgaladra vyam eva. sa katham bahvavayavo bhavet? kimatra pratipādyam ? nanu prasiddham evedam eka-rasagandha-varno dvisparsas cīņūr bhavati, bhāvāvayavaih sävayavo dravyāvaya: vair niravayava iti. agamaś ca : "kaivihe nam bhamte bhāvaparamāņū pannatte ? Goyamā cauvvibe bhāvaparamāņā paņpatte...tam jahä-vannamamte, rasamaste, gamdhamamte phāsamamte iti”. 3 TSū, V. 16: pradeśa-samhära-visargābhyām pradipavat, Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 ... 252