Epigraphia Indica Vol 28

Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Page 19

xvi
Page 282, foot-notes 3 and 4.-Add note: The long syllable at the end of the feet in the stanzas
in question has been regarded as short (cf. Kale, Higher Sanskrit Grammar, App., pp. 1-2; Apte, Sans.-Eng. Dict., p. 1035).'
282, foot-note 10.-For anupraraya read "anupravaraya
284, foot-note 3, line 3.-Read the dvija-rāja
287, line 13.-For Sömesvaradeva read Sömesvaradeva
294, line 17.-For Desiya read Desiya
300, last para.-Add note: The duplication of Umavarman seems to be unwarranted.'
300, foot-note 4.-Add note:
Visakhavarman cannot be regarded as the son of Umavar
man on the ground that Visakha is repersented in Hindu mythology as the son of Umā. We know that Budhagupta was not a son of Chandragupta in spite of the mythological representation of Chandra as the father of Budha.'
33
33
""
39
302, text, line 2.-Read samavētān-ku
302, text, line 9.-Add note: Some words of the passage dharmakrama-vikramābhyām= anyatama-yögād-avapya mahim-anuśāsatām-idaṁ dānam are omitted in the original.'
,,302, text, line 11.-Read vasudha
39
,, 302, text, line 15.-For kri° read kri
39
303, lines 5-6.-Read the grant portion of the inscription incised on plates VI-VII
33
,, 303, line 8.-Read Jagannatha temple
303, line 9.-Read seven plates; but
305, line 9.-For kar read kari
305, line 10.-For rajyaru-e read rajyaru e
307, line 43.-Read (mudhya kari)
308, line 36.-Read approximately
308, foot-note 4, line 1.-Read ink or point
309, text, line 7.-Read sa[m*]dhivigraha
312, text, line 23.-Read subham-astu
317, line 19.-For has read have
317, line 32.-For incidently read incidentally
320, text, line 12.-For dhanam read dhanath(nam)
321, line 19.-Read put in. The reasons
33
39
29
33
39
39
33
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
33
39
39
302, text, line 12.-Read bhumi[s*]=tasya
"
321, line 20.-Read now apparent." In a note
322, line 35.-For does not read do not
331, foot-note 7.-For drangika read drängika
332, foot-note 5.-For pēdā-päla read pēdā-pāla