Anekantajay patakakhyam Prakaranam Part 2

Author(s): Haribhadrasuri, Munichandrasuri
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Page 93

LO'
INTRODUCTION
of the middle term with the major term the inference cannot be valid because the powers of both vary according to time and place'.
Mallavidin Mallavādin, the commentator of Sammaipayarana has been referred to in AJP (Vol. I, pp. 58 & 116 ) as Vadimukhya". Further, herein two quotations are given from his com. on Sammaïpnyarana. They are:
(i)'ancuradigan erTË Baraat arran1" (ii) "7 PaTHENTIA sq: iar faqaftur grua, gata 11"
This same Malavādin is said to be the author of Dvidasara-nayacakrce. He cannot be the țippanīkāra of Nyāya. vinduļikā; otherwise he would be a contemporary of our Haribhadra (700 A, D.-770 A. D.) and not his predecessor. So it follows that just as we have two Bhadrabālius there must be two Mallavādins. Malayagiri Sūri in his com. (p. 12a) on Āvassaya has mentioned the name of Vallavādin and has quoted a verse in Pūïya from some work of his as under:
"सह विसेस सङ्गह विसेसपत्थारमूलवागरणी।
दव्वढिओ य पज्जवनओ य सेसा वियप्पा सिं ॥" Candrasena*, pupil of Pradumna Sûri in his com. (p. 222) on his own work Utpailäilisiddhiprakarana notes the name of Mallarādin and quotes a kariká composed by the latter as under :
“विधिनयमनवृत्तिव्यतिरिक्तत्वादनर्थकवचोवत् । जैनाइन्यच्छासनमनृतं भवतीति वैधर्म्यम् ॥"
1 In the svopajña com, on Siddhahemacandra (II, 2, 39) we have " 377
HEATRE 11:”. 2 Haribhadra has somehow dropped the word 'tikā', and this leads
one to believe that it is from Sanmaipayarana. Anandasāgara Süri defends this in "Siddhacakra" (Vol. IV, No. 8. p. 174) by saying that he has looked upon the text and its com, as non-distinct, Ho has further added that many a time Avassayz.
nijjutti is referred to as Āvassaya. 3 This very line iş quoted by Malayagiri in bis com. (p. 260a) on
,Dhamma saigaheni with this difference that there is युक्तो tor युज्यते. 4 He has quoted on p. 216 of his com, the first verse of AJP and
the verso grosseto op. p. 116.