Book Title: Anekantajay patakakhyam Prakaranam Part 2
Author(s): Haribhadrasuri, Munichandrasuri
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 390
________________ P. 11, 1.7] Prabhacandra in his Prameyakamalamartanda (Nir. edn., p. 156), too, has mentioned eight faults; but instead of counting apratipatti separately he has noted ubhaya. NOTES 259 Tarka pañcanana Abhayadeva Suri in his com. (p. 452) on Sammaïpayarana has mentioned seven, and thus his view agrees in number with Vadin Deva Suri's quotation noted on p. 258; but it differs in this sense that he mentions abhava instead of vyatikara. In TRD (p. 93b) the following nine faults are noted and refuted:1-विरोध, संशय, अनवस्था, वैयधिकरण्य, सक्कर, व्यतिकर, व्यवहारलोप, प्रमाणबाध' & असम्भव *. Virodha is of three kinds: (i) परस्परपरिहारस्थिति, (ii) वध्यघातक and (iii) are. Suppose there is a mango-fruit which is green in colour and sour in taste. When it is so, it is not yellow in colour and sweet in taste. This is possible only when the first state gets removed. Thus both of these states are mutually exclusive of one another and not co-existent. A serpent and a mongoose are not found together; for, the former is vadhya (prey) and the latter a ghataka (destroyer). Further, the former is weaker as compared with the latter. So, if these two were to co-exist, it will be a second type of contradiction. There is a vadhya-ghātaka-nyāya i. e. a maxim of the destroyer and its prey. It is implied in Taittiriyavārtika (2-1-66) and Vais esika-bhāṣya (pp. 112-113). Cold and heat do not exist together; for, they are opposed to each other. If they were to do so, they will be looked upon as an example of the third type of contradiction. None of these three types of contradiction exists here; for, it is not form one and the same stand-point that being' and 'non-being' are admitted in the case of reality. This topic is treated in TRD (p. 94a). Further, there it is said: “किञ्चायं विरोधः किं स्वरूपमात्रसद्भावकृतः १ उतैककालासम्भवेन २ आहोस्विदेकद्रव्यायोगेन ३ किमेककालैकद्रव्याभावतः ४ उतैककालैकद्रव्यैकप्रदेशासम्भवात् ५११ तत्राद्यो न युक्तः, यतो नहि शीतस्पर्शोऽनपेक्षितान्यनिमित्तः स्वात्मसद्भाव एवोष्णस्पर्शेन सह विरुध्यते, वेतरेण, अन्यथा त्रैलोक्येऽप्यभावः स्वादनयोरिति । 1 For the exposition of this topic in Guj, see pp. 168-171 of Jaina darsana (a translation of Saddarśanasamuccaya and TRD) by Pandit Bechardas and Tattväkhyāna (pt. II, pp. 146-161) by the late Upadhyaya Mangalavijaya. 2 Violation or cangellation of convention. 3 Opposition to valid proof. 4 Impossibility. 5 As other examples may be mentioned a cow and a tiger, a mouse and a cat and the like which have innate antipathy. 6 Cold and heat are not contradictories in modern sense; for, there is a possibility of a substance being neither hot nor cold.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503