Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 12
Author(s): Jas Burgess
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 243
________________ SANSERIT AND OLD-CANARESE INSCRIPTIONS. AUGUST, 1883.] samkhyaya cha samanvité || Vilombi-namaké varshé másé Kárttika-námani paurnumásyám sité pakshe váré Sasisutasya cha; and in-97, the Bâdâmi inscription of Sadasivas (11. 1-5) Sri-jayabhyudaya-Sáliváhana-saka 7469neya Plavashga samvatsarada A(á)svayuja su 75yalú. No. 96 above speaks of the era as being established (nirrita) by Salivahana. I have met with no inscription which states, as the Puranas do, that the era was reckoned from his birth. In fact, the only epigraphical passage that speaks of the epoch of the era, No. 36 above, refers it to his coronation, and not to his birth. But I quote a passage to that effect published by Professor Max Müller." It is 98, a verse at the end of the Muhurtamartanda, recording the date of its composition; Try-ashk-Endra-pramité varshé Sá SANSKRIT AND OLD-CANARESE INSCRIPTIONS. BY J. F. FLEET, Bo.C.S., M.R.A.S. (Continue from p. 165.) No. CXXVIII. Govinda III. was succeeded by his son, Amôghavarsha I. This is only a title; but it is the appellation by which he is best known. The present inscription gives him also the titles of Atifayadhavals and Nripatungs T The only historical facts recorded of him, in the other inscriptions of his dynasty, are that he defeated the Chalukyas, Abhyûshakhas, and others, at a place named Vingavalli, which is evidently a Canarese name, but which I cannot identify, and that he built the city of Manyak hêta, which became the capital of his descendants. This city has been satisfactorily identified by Dr. Bühler with Malkhed in the Nizâm's Dominions, about ninety miles in a south-easterly direction from Shôlâpur. Mânyakhêta, however, would appear to have been a Rashtrakuta city even before the time of Amôghavarsha I. Dr. Bühler's grant of Dhruva III. (of the Gujarât Branch) explicitly gives Subhatunga as one of the titles of Krishna I. And the same title,-though, owing to the fragmentary nature of the inscription the full bearing of it could not then ss Ind. Ant. Vol. X. pp. 64 ff. so India; What can it teach us? pp. 300 f. Ante. Vol. VI. p. 64.-This identification was first suggested by Prof. H. H. Wilson; Jour. R. As, Soc.. O. S., Vol. II. p. 393. At any rate, by Mankhera in the Hyderabad country,' he seems to mean Malkhed. 215 liváhana-janmataḥ | kritas-Tapasi Mártamḍô= yam-alash jayat-údgataḥ. As Professor Max Müller has pointed out, in his comments on this passage, it is not exactly wrong to speak of the era as the Salivahana era or Sáliváhana-Saka; for, as I have shown above, there are ample instances in which the natives of India, in epigraphical records of authority and of some antiquity, themselves give it that name. At the same time, whatever opinion may be held to the existence of a king named Salivahana at the time when the era was established, those same instances shew that it was only in comparatively modern times that his name came to be connected with the era, and that in all discussions respecting early dates it is an anachronism, and it is a mistake, to call it by his name. (To be continued.) be seen, has already occurred in connection with Krishna I., in verse 13 of the Kâvi grant,* where the original reading probably was Subhatunga-tunga-[námá]. And a MS. of the Kathakosa, belonging to a Jain priest of the Seṭṭikêri street in Belgaum, has in it, at page 4a, the verse: Atr-aiva bhavati Mânyakhêt-âkhya-nagare varê | raj-abhuch-Chhubhatumg-akhyas tan-mantri Purushottamaḥ || "Here, O lady! at the excellent city named Mânyakheta, there was a king named Subhatunga; his councillor was Purushôt tama." We have two inscriptions of the reign of Amôghavarsha I. in the Kanhêri Caves, which are dated Śaka 775 for 773 (A.D. 851-2), the Prajapati samvatsara, and Saka 799, and record that, in the time of Kapardi II. of the Konkana branch of the Sila håra family, the whole of the Konkana was presented by Amôghavarsha, apparently to Kapardi II. The second of these two inscriptions gives the latest date that has as yet been obtained for The 'Mulkaid' of the maps; Lat. 17° 12' N., Long. 770 14' E. Ante. pp. 179. Vol. V. pp. 144 ff. Shown to me by Mr. K. B. Pathak. Pandit Bhagwanlal Indraji; Jour. Bo. Br. R. As. Soc. Vol. XIII., p. 11.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390