Sambodhi 1996 Vol 20

Author(s): Jitendra B Shah, N M Kansara
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Page 85

Vol. XX, 1996
VARIANTS FROM VENISAMHĀRA AND...
(.) edn. p. II (p. 169) has also shown it in the ft. note (p. 1, p. 15)
ज्ञानोत्सेकात्
N. S. edn. of the Veni (p. 27) has
with
edu. (p. 37), Gaj. edn. (p. 21) & Des, edn. (p. 23) have a
edn. (p. 10) & Madras edn. (p. 25) have.
81
in the ft. note. Chau. while Poona
The different commentaries on the K. P. differ in giving this variant. Some of them have ज्ञानोद्रेकात्. See
Jha edn. (p. 424), . edn. (p. 454), R. P. edn. (p. 438), edn. (p. 293). edn. p. II (p. 120) & fat. edn. p. II (p. 96).
प्र. & उedn (p. 357) & संकेत (मा.) edn (p. 159 ) have ज्ञानोद्रेकात् with ज्ञानोत्सेकात् in the ft. note, while संकेत (सो.) edn. p. II ( p. 169) has ज्ञानोत्सेकात् with सत्त्वोद्रेकात् & in the ft. note (p. 1 p.15)
a
विवेक edn (p. 246 ) has ज्ञानोत्कर्षात्, but श्रीधर has noted ज्ञानं प्रकाशात्मकं तदुद्रेकात् in his commentary. Thus seems to be favoured by him.
सा. चू & सं. प्र.edn (p. 127) has ज्ञानोत्कर्षात् with ज्ञानोत्सेकात् in the ft. note - ०त्सेकाद इति मूलकोशपाठः ।
० तमोग्रन्थयः
The different commentaries on the K. P. have also 357) has in the ft. note. Moreover, in 3 Jha. (p. 424) has criticized both the readings.
कमपि
All editions of the Veni and those of the K. P. have this variant, but, . & J. edn. on the K. P. (p. 357) has also noted the other reading
: in the ft.
note.
वीक्षते
All editions of the Veni have this variant, but N. S. edn. (p. 27) also mentions the otherones in the ft. note.
far, but . & 3. edn. (p. (p. 358) is referred.
All editions of the Venī have this reading, but N. S. edn. (p. 27), Gaj. edn. (p. 21) Des. edn. (p. 23) have also mentioned ff for f in the ft. note. The different commentaries on the K. P. do not differ in giving this variant. मोहान्ध :
This variant is accepted by all edns. of the Veni and those of the K. P. but N.