Book Title: Sambodhi 1983 Vol 12
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 104
________________ ON THE TEXT OF A verse in the Bhitari Stone Pillar Inscription of Skandagupta Satyavrat Tlie controversy sparked off by Verse Seven of The Bhitari Stone Pillai Inscuption of the Gupta monarchi, Skandagupta, on restoration of possibly the correct text of its last quarter, has lately assumed interesting, though somewhat dogmatic overtones, with the jumping of some of the stalwarts into the fray. V. C. Pandey is disposed to follow with faithful tenacity J. F. Fleet, who, stiay efforts not withstanding, is credited with the first cohcrcit reading and translation of the line that run as follows : vã. TFH* 293171 919909179ath : "Whom the bards raise to distinction with (their) songs and praises"i Prof. J. N. Agrawal too has been an equally a dent champion of Fleet's reading, though, on his own adınıssion, he had often felt sceptical of the precise import of the text. It is a measure of the intensity of his misgivings about the vecacity of the text, that while teaching us the inscription, way back in 1937, he had retained the reading, as made out by Fleet but had translated it almost in the manner, he lias done recently. It is a pointer to the fact that while he had hit upon the intended sense, loug back, he was unsure, to say the least, of the correct reading of the live. Since some momentous issues pertaining to the origin and character of Skandagupti are involved in the text of the line and interpretation thercof it mcrits an honest and unbiased evaluation. Dr. Pandey, while cspousing Hect's reading, sights many phantoms in the verse. Thus, it is to his ingenuity that we owe the breathtaking suggestion that Skandgupta had the 'Aryastatus' (aryata) bestowed upon him by petty bards, implying thereby that he, for svoth, was not an Arya. Skandagupta's non-Aryan. hood, Dr. Pandey further avers, emanated from the low origin of his mother, who, he would have us belive, was of Savaravarna' and as such not a Mahadevi. However, he stops short of denigrating her as a concubine, though that would have formed the most fitting finale to his tortured interpretation of the verse.4 While there is nothing in the Gupta history, as we know it, to uphold the supposed 'low origin of Skandagupta's mother or to prove that she was not the chief queen of Kumaragupta, it would he naive to believe that Skanda gupta was absol

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326