Book Title: Nirgrantha-2
Author(s): M A Dhaky, Jitendra B Shah
Publisher: Shardaben Chimanbhai Educational Research Centre

Previous | Next

Page 136
________________ Vol. II-1996 Style and Composition in the.... James Burgess criticized the architecture of these caves rather harshly. "The two principal Jaina Caves," he wrote, "are very extensive works, superior both in extent and elaboration to any of the Brahmanical caves, excepting of course the Kailasa, and the Viśvakarma... Though two storeys in height and extremely rich in decoration.... [they] are entirely deficient in that purpose-like architectural expression which characterized the works of the two earlier religions.... the plan is compressed, and all their arrangements seem to result more from accident than to have arisen from any well-conceived design, so that they lose half the effect that might have been produced with far less elaboration of detail" 19. Certainly, the effect of a less elaborate but more strictly ordered design would have been different, although we might question the implication that the design of the Kailasa temple is a paragon of logical planning, but, like the Kailasa, these cave-temples are a product more of the sculptural than the architectural imagination. If their arrangements seem more accidental than "well-conceived," it may be that the carvers and their patrons valued richness of detail more than grand spatial effects and that their vision was fully realized through their conceptions. 85 REFERENCES: 1. James Fergusson and James Burgess, The Cave Temples of India, London 1880, Oriental Books reprint, New Delhi 1969, pp. 495-502. See also James Burgess, Archaeological Survey of Western India, Vol. V, New Delhi 1883. 2. K. R. Srinivasan, "Chapter 18: The Deccan," in Jaina Art and Architecture (ed. A. Ghosh,) Vol. I, New Delhi 1974, pp. 188-194. 3. José Pereira, Monolithic Jinas, The Iconography of the Jain Temples of Ellora, Motilal Banarsidass, Varanasi 1977. 4. The following is a condensed (and slightly revised) version of my summary of the reign of Amoghavarṣa I, which appeared in my Ph. D. dissertation, Stylistic Sources and Relationships of the Kailasa Temple at Ellora, University of California, Berkeley 1977. 5. See Fergusson and Burgess, The Caves Temples., and Pereira, Monolithic Jinas. 6. Navsari grant of Indra III, Epigraphia Indica, IX, p. 39. 7. I. e., the date of the Surat plates of Karkkarāja, which first mention the event. (Epigraphia Indica, IX, p. 39.) 8. See the Begumra grant of Dhruva II (A. D. 867), I.A., XII, pp. 179 ff. and A.S. Altekar, Age of Imperial Kanauj, pp. 8-11. (R. C. Majumdar, Gen. Ed.), The History and Culture of the Indian People, Vol. IV, Bombay 1955, 1964. 9. The Kardā grant, at the end of Rastrakūta power (A. D. 972-973), recalls the glory of Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326