Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 54 Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Stephen Meredyth Edwardes, Krishnaswami Aiyangar Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 54
________________ 41 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [ MARCH, 1925 SPURIOUS GHOTIA PLATES OF PRITHVIDEVA II. BY RAI BAHADUR HIRA LAL, B.A. THESE Copper plates were brought to light by Mr. Ishwar Segram, Tahsildar in Baloda Bazar of the Raipur District in the Central Provinces. They were found by a cultivator of Ghotia in his field. Mr. N. J. Roughton, I.C.S., the Deputy Commissioner of the District, was good enough to send the plates to me for deciphering the record on them. The plates measure 13 in. x 8 in. and are strung with a ring having the King's seal on it. The weight of the plates with the ring is 294 tolas or a little less than 7 lbs. The seal is circular with a seated figure of Gaja Lakshmi, having an elephant on each side pouring water on her. Below the figure of the goddess is inscribed Raja Srîmat Prithvîdeva in two lines, the letter Śri being reversed. The characters of the record are Nâgarî of the Kalachuri type, belonging to the 12th or 13th century A.D. There are 36 lines in all containing 26 Sanskrit verses, the invocation at the beginning and the name of the engraver and date at the end being alone in prose. The record bristles with spelling mistakes, not one verse or line being free from them, but this is apparently due to the ignorance of the engraver, who left out several letters which he could not read, leaving blank spaces for filling up afterwards, a thing which was unfortunately never done. Had only one ellipsis, viz:-the date of the month, been filled up, it would have been possible to demonstrate at once the forgery of this record, to be referred to later on. The inscription purports to record the grant of a village Gothayâ1, apparently situated in Sagatta Mandala, to one Gopâla Sarmâ of the Asvalâyana Gotra, having the three pravaras Vasishtha, Maitrâvaruna and Kaunḍinya. He was born of Rihila, son of Hari Brahman, and was a learned man, as he had studied the Śrutis, Smritis and Puranas. To me it appears that it was he? who made use of his great learning in committing this forgery, the composition whereof has been attributed to a Vâstavya (Kayastha) Vatsaraja, son of Kirtidhara. The Haihaya King Prithvideva II has been made the donor, and his genealogy is given, commencing from Kekkala (Kokkala), the name of Karttavîrya being mentioned as the originator of the family. The descendants of Kokkala who find a mention are his son Kalingaraja, grandson Kamalarâja, and great-grandson Ratnarâja (I). The latter's wife was Nonallâ, from whom was born Prithvîdeva (I), whose son was Jâjalladeva (I), whose son was Ramhadeva (Ratnadeva II), whose son was Prithvideva (II), 'of bright fame.' The charter is dated Samvat 1000 on a Thursday of the bright fortnight of Bhadrapada month, the most important item, the date being omitted. The record does not state what Samvat it refers to. If it be taken to be the Kalachuri or Chedi era, which was started in 248 A.D. by the ancestors of the King mentioned in this record and which was universally used in Kosala or Chhattisgarh, of which Ratnadeva II is mentioned as an ornament in the tenth verse of this record, we would arrive at a period (1248 A.D.) when Prithvideva II's great-grandson and namesake, Prithvideva III, had ceased to rule and the latter's grandson or great-grandson was occupying the throne. Clearly, therefore, the Samvat referred to in the record cannot be a Kalachuri one. After the disuse of this era in Chhattisgarh we find no other Samvat in use, except Vikrama or Saka. The latest date in the Kalachuri era found on inscriptions of Chhattisgarh is 933 (1181 A.D.), of the time of Ratnadeva III.3 A record belonging to the time of his son Prithvideva III, (after whom no successors find an inscriptional mention, though the line continued up till 1 Clearly the present Ghotia, where the plates were found. * He may not have enjoyed the grant himself, but surely he left it as a legacy to his descendants. He may not have been even a contemporary of Prithvidova II. Epi. Ind., vol. I, p. 451.Page Navigation
1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376