Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 54
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Stephen Meredyth Edwardes, Krishnaswami Aiyangar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 177
________________ AUGUST, 1926 ) THE TATTVA PRAKASA 181 THE TATTVA PRAKASA. (Of King Sri Bhojadeva.) TRANSLATED BY THE Rev. E. P. JANVIER, M.A., FATEHGARA, WITH A 'FOREWORD BY DR. J. N. FARQUHAR. Foreword. The early history of the great Saiva sects is far from clear. The two chapters in the Sarvadarsanasangraha, called respectively Nakulisa Pasupata and Saiva Darsana, give us sketches of the teaching of two contrasted schools. In the later books belonging to the type of the Saiva Darsana there are statements to the effect that the former type was revealed by Rudra, the latter by Siva : see Bhandarkar, Vaishnavism, Saivism, etc., 126-7; 16) and it is quite clear that the two groups of sects differ largely from each other both in teacning and practice. In my Outline of the Religious Literature of India, I have ventured to distinguish the groups as Pabupata Saivas and Agamic Saivas, because the teaching of the latter group rests finally on the Agamas, while the former goes back, as Madhava shéws us, at least to the tinie of the formation of the Lakulisa Pasupata sect, which appeared long before the Agamas were written. In Madhava's eesay, Saiva Darsana, a good many of the ancient books are mentioned, especially the following Agamas, Mrigendra, Paushkara, Karana, Kalottara, Kirana and Saurabheya, and two works of which I know nothing, the Bahudaivatya and the Tattva Sangraha. Several ancient scholars are also mentioned, the Siddh Guru, Aghora Siva Acharya, Rama Kantha, Soma Sambhu and Narayana Kantha ; but they also seem to be otherwise unknown. But there are three quotations from a treatise called Tattva Prakasa and one from Bhojaraja; and it now turns out tbat Bhojaraja, king of Malwa, who reigned at Dhara, 1018-1060 A.D., is the author of the Tattva Prakasa. The text has been found, and is published in the Trivandrum Sanskrit Series, and all four quotations occur in it, I. 6, 7, 13, 17, and also a fifth passage which is referred to, I. 8-10. It is clear that several sects come under the general category of Agamic Saivas, notably the Vira Saivas and the Tamil Saiva Siddhanta. Cowell and Gough, in their translation of the Sarvadarsanasangraha, take it for granted toat the system described as the Saiva Darsana is identical with the system of the Tamil Saiva school ; but whether the system is identical or not, it is clear there were two distinct groups, one scattered all over India whose literature was in Sanskrit, the other found only in the South, its literature all in Tamil. It also seems probable that the earliest books of the Sanskrit literature were written several centuries before the earliest books of the Tamil dogmatic began to appear. I should therefore be inclined to conjecture that the earliest books of the Saiva Darsana were written by the Siddha Guru and other leaders at early dates, say between 500 and 1000 A.D., and that the Tattva-prakasa, written probably between 1030 and 1050 A.D., proved one of the simplest and clearest manuals of the sect, so that it was well fitted for quotation in a brief essay such as Madhava's is; and that the later books, including Srikantha Sivacharya's Bhashya, which are discussed by Bhandarkar, are the continuation of the same movement. It is probable that the people who professed the system were mainly Smartas : that is clearly true of Bhojadev.; and the few families which, to my knowledge, still profess the system in the South are Smartas resident in the Tanjore and Tinnevelly districts. It is possible that careful inquiry might discover others in North India who still cherish the old literature. The Tamil Saiva Siddhanta rests primarily on the Tamil hymns of the great early singers, and the sect is a popular one, with many adherents among the common people all over the South. It is probable that the Tamil dogmatic was produced partly under the stimulus of the Sanskrit books. Yet it is also probable that the two eystems differ in a number of details : the Vedantic standpoint of the Sanskrit system is certainly Visishtadvaita, while the Tamil Saiva standpoint is called Sivadvaita;

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376