Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 54
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Stephen Meredyth Edwardes, Krishnaswami Aiyangar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 236
________________ 206 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY (NOVEMBER, 1925 He then says that the early Sumerians wrote numbers as strokes (e.g., for 1, | for 2 and so on), which became circular holes when applied by a drill to stone: 0–1, 00 or 9- 2, and so on. He found that "many of our numerals in English, and in the Assyrian languages generally, are also derived from the Sumerian names for these numbers, although the fact has not hitherto been noticed.” We have already had his ideas on 'one' being equivalent to Sumerian ana and now he tells us that through "the occult values attached to certain numbers by the Sumerians," we are able to identify the Hitto-Sumerian god-names on the seals and tablets with the names of the leading Aryau gods of classic Greece and Rome, of the Indiau Vedas, of the Gothic Eddas, and of the ancient Britons, as inscribed on their pre-Roman coins and monuments. So 0-1 or 10 - God as monad : 00 -2 or 20 = the Sun. god : 000 = 3 or 30= the Moon or Moon-god, and so on up to nine figures and two special kinds of o. Waddell then launches into an explanation of the cup-marks in the light of the above observation and certain startling philological comparisons, which are not easy to follow. He arrives in the course of his study at a remarkable philological conclusion :-" It will be seen, in scanning the key-list in the table, that the first or single circle or cup-mark, title for God, Ia or Jove, or the One God, has the value of A (i.e., the Greek Alpha : whilst the title for Him is the largo double o (i.e., the Greek O-mega, a name now seen to be also derived from the Sumerian mukh, great, and surviving in Scotch, 'muckle' or English much' and magnitude,' 13 etc. It thus appears that the early Sumerian and our own 'pagan' ancient Briton ancestors called the Father God Ia or Jove by the very same title as God in the Apocalypse, namely, Alpha and Omega, the First and the Last.'” In a footnote Waddell adds that "Ia is also Indara.” By the key-list Waddell reads the inscription on the scene about Adam already noticed, to mean "how Adam broke the wing of the stormy South-wind." He also read many other Hitto-Babylonian seals and found them to explain "the circles on ancient Briton coins and the cup-markings of pre-historic Britain," so that he could even read these last. Waddell in the same way next reads "the archaic Morite table of about B.C. 400" found at Smyrna, on which he asks us to "note the initial word-sign for 'tomb' in the picture of the ancient barrow of the Indo-Aryans with its finial called thupa or tope," i.e., according to his reading : but surely the Buddhistic stúpa ortope' was a reliquary not a tomb. The 'word-sign' is, however, remarkable, as under Waddell's reading of the tablet, it is to "a princess or priestess of the Bel-fire cult, named Nina, who is significantly called therein an Ari, i.e., Arya and Muru, i.e., Mor or Amorite. It invokes Taś for the aid of resuscitating the underground Sun and the Word Cross." Finally he says : -" it is significant that a large proportion of the words of the Morite tablet of about B.C. 4000 are radically identical with those of modern English, thus the second and third 'good girl' occur literally in the M Sumerian as kud-gal.'" This is truly an astonishing deduction, as, even granting that' kud gal' is a right transcription of the picture writing, which I give here, both the translation into good girl' and the transcription rest on the single assertion of Waddell himself, He next proceeds to " unlock the long lost meaning and racial authorship of .... the prehistoric cup-marking in the British Isles” by the same keys, and finds them to be substantially identical with the Sumerian cup-marked solar amulets of Early Troy," and thus to be "Litanies for the resurrection of the dead by the Sun-Cross." He reads them to be invocations to the Archangel Tay, la or Jove - Indra. Their date he presumes to be that of the Stone Circles, B.C. 2800. He also shows a Briton coin inscribed Tascio' with 18 All this seems to mean that in Waddell's view Sumerian makh is the origin of the Groek, megas; Latin Magnus; English, much; Scotch, muckle.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376