Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 02
Author(s): Jas Burgess
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 82
________________ 74 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY. [MARCH, 1873. the age of Râma's incarnation lasted. And | Das'arûpaka ;§ and this commentary in its secondly and this is of greater importance I have not been able to discover the stanza after looking through the whole of the drama for it, and after having once before read it. At present, therefore, we cannot in this investigation press to our aid the mention of Harsha by Jayadeva. earlier pages abounds with quotations from the Venisan hâra, which must, therefore, at that time have been old enough to be regarded as fit for quotation. Hence it would seem to result that the date of the migration of Bhatta Nârâyana must be put back a century or so; but this still, only on the hypothesis that this Bhatta Nârâyana is identical with the author of the Venisan hâra. If so, and again taking Bâbu Rajendralâla's identification of the poet Śrî Harsha to be correct, it will follow that the Bâbu's conclusion as thus adjusted will be supported by the two different lines of argument suggested in my letter. The date of Sri Harsha is casually alluded to in Professor Cowell's Preface to Mr. Palmer Boyd's Translation of the Nâgânanda Nâṭaka. But the Professor, after first remarking that his age is uncertain, simply refers to the conjecture of Babu Rajendralâla Mitra upon it, and then adds" But I find, from a notice in the first number of the Indian Antiquary, that Dr. Bühler of Bombay has recently fixed his date. in the twelfth century." Having regard to what has been said above on this point, this remark of Professor Cowell's cannot, of course, be considered satisfactory. Bâbu Rajendralâla identifies this Śri Harsha with the Śrî Harsha who went over to the court of Ádisûra, in company with others, one of whom was Bhatta Nârâyana, the author of the Venîsanhâra Nataka. But the Bâbu adds that "this assumption, probable as it may appear, is, it must be admitted, founded entirely upon presumptive evidence, and must await future more satisfactory research for confirmation." The period of this migration of Harsha and Nârâyana is fixed by Babu Rajendralâla in the middle of the tenth century-by a calculation, however, which admittedly can give a result but roughly correct. But it seems clear that, if the Bhatta Nârâyana, who was received at his palace by king Ádisûra, was the author of the Venîsanhâra, the date fixed by Babu Rajendralâla for his migration must undergo some modification. For about the middle of the tenth century, if not earlier, lived Dhanika, the author of the commentary on the The net result of this investigation may be thus stated:-The Jaina biographer's account, albeit it has some points in its favour, cannot be much trusted. On the other hand, the fact of the Naishadhiya being quoted in a work which, at the latest, dates from the beginning of the eleventh century; the fact of the work of a poet, probably contemporaneous with Śrî Harsha, being quoted in a work dating from a still earlier period; the fact of an exceedingly well-known and well-informed writer of the fourteenth century making Śrî Harsha the contemporary of a philosopher who flourished some six centuries or more before his time:these facts indicate a period which is about two centuries earlier than the period to which the Harsha Prabandha, assigns the subject of its narrative. And although the considerations here adduced against Rajasekhara's statement do not fix with any precision the date towards which they seem to point, still they are of value, at least to this extent that they show pretty clearly that the question of the date at which Sri Harsha flourished is not one which can be regarded as finally settled even by the circumstantial narrative of the Harsha Prabandha. *See page 12. Journal of the A. S. of Bengal, No. III., 1864, p. 326,alluded to by Prof. Cowell. Ibid., p 327. See Hall's Das'arúpa, Pref. pp. 2, 3,-with which should be coupled Hall's Vasavadatta, Pref. p. 50 addendum to p. 9, notes 1. 12. See pp. 16, 18, 19, &c., and see Wilson's remarks in his Hindu Theatre. See Babu Rajendralala's paper above referred to, p. 326.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428