________________
Epithets of Lord Mahapla in Early Jaina Canon
Satraklanga they have become the names (111,1 1 27, 14 2 22: 1. 924, 1 14 11 ) For the first timo Mabavira is given an epithet of "iggantha' (1 14 11) which is found also 10 Pali-pitakas es Nigantha Mula putta Naya, Naya putte aod Nayasuye are also used in Sutrakpanga (1 1 27, 2 3 22, 2 3 31,6 14, 21, 23, 24, 26) Like Mahavira now be 18 Mahamuni (1924, 2 2 15, 2 1 14) Indicating his gotra Kasave is added in Su (2 2 7 2 2 25, 2 3 20,3 3 20, 34 21, 11 s. 32. 15 21.6 7) Showiog his relation to Vaisāli be is also kaown as I esalia (2 3.22) The previous tradition of Nina, Araha and Bhagan 18 also continued (2 3 19, 2 3 22, 6 26,6 29, 2, 3 22, 16, 1, 2, 3 14) LA Sutrakrtadga it is quite clear that there was an order or the religion kaowa Al Jinasasana (3, 4 9) or Jinana Dhamma (
67) or Bhagannussan (2 3 14), and we find the meation of Jingdayana (14 13) and Jurura ( 96). The torms Buddha and tathagata are also not absent (11 25. Ii 36. 12 16, 12 18,15 18,13 2 15 20) but as meationed above later on they indicated only the Buddha and not Mahavira Hence also like Ice nga the term Savvannt 18 absent but instead wo find a GT marfa aul (
6 24), Anantacakkhu (6 6, 6 25) Savoadahsi abhibhulya (2, 5). damsana-nāṇasilo (614), Apantañanadanhst (924) and even se wat anut taraṇantanuttaradansi anuttaranaqadarsanadhare arha - Niya pulte bhagavan Vesalie (2 3 22), Tilogadansi (1416) and Jagasaonadohet (2 331)
Here a technical torm for an ompiclent person is used for the fint time, पुच्छिसहं केवलियं महेसी-५. १ १, एवं केवलिणो मयं ११. ३८, केवायं ममाहि
This foilowing gatha is corious because there is no mention of JHL varana
जमईय पडुप्पन्न मागमिस्स च नायओ । सव्वं मन्नह तं ताई दसणावरणतए ॥ १५.१ The following traditional terms are also present in Sa.niggantha (
924), mahana (11, 1; 9 1), makest (6, 26), paramamahest (6 17), Muni ( 67), pabhu (
628), samaņa (6 14 23) But it should be noted that the term Titthayara is not used
Ācāringa, Part 1
In the second part of Acaranga the life of Mabgvira as a householder is also given (2 175) It should be noted that nothing of the kind i found
