Book Title: Samayasara OR Nature of Self
Author(s): A Chakravarti
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 87
________________ 1xXXVI SAMAYASARA the fact that some of the founders of Vedic schools Apasthambha and Kathyayana are spoken of as Dravidian and the Tamil work already referred to also speaks of the prevalent Indra worship in the South Taking all these facts we have to assign the Aryan migration somewhere about the 7th Century BC. The migration of Aryans with their characteristic Indra worship must certainly have been associated with the Sankhya school which was manily opposed to Indra worship and animal sacrifice, that is the two schools of thought must have come down to the south almost simultaneously Another thing we may notice in this connection is this. The school of revolt against Brahminical ritualism must generally be more liberal in its social aspect. This is clearly borne out in the case of Jaina and Buddhistic schools The Sankhya school was evidently at one with these two schools in removing the social barriers against religious devotees. Such an assumption well borne out by sister schools of thought would explain the fact that among the alwars of the south we find representatives from among all strata of society irrespective of the distinction of Arya and Dravida The Vaishnava tradition is confirmed even by Ramanuja's teachings though by a strange irony of fate his followers at present represent the most bigoted form of orthodoxy. Sankhya Philosophy The term Sankhya according to European scholars is derived from Sankhya or number, because Kapila enumerates a number of Tatwas as constituting elements of reality. The term is supposed to be related to number. But according to Indian thinker the term is synonymous with discrimination. This is the meaning in which the term is used in the Mahabharata. Vignanabikshu a famous writer of the Sankhya school also explains the term as discrimination or setting forth the distinction between spirit or atman on the one hand and matter or Prakriti on the other. Sankara also adopts the same interpretation. Hence the traditional meaning nay be accepted as more correct and the other one suggested by European scholars has to be rejected as far fetched. Some of them even go to the length of connecting the Sankhya system with the Pythagorean school. Pythagoreanism is also connected with the mystric doctrine of numbers.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406