Book Title: Samayasara OR Nature of Self
Author(s): A Chakravarti
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 156
________________ INTRODUCTION clv NATURE AND THE EXTERNAL WORLD. The reality of the external world is admitted by the Jaina metaphysics as in the case of Sankhya philosophy The Upanishadic thought also maintains the reality of the external world in spite of its pantheistic monism. The other commentators of Vedanta Sutras, besides Sankara also maintain the reality of the external world. Sankara himself while contradicting the Buddhistic school of Vignana Vada accepts the doctrine of the reality of the external world in refuting the Buddhistic school. The Vignana Vada school of the Buddhistic philosophy which maintains that the external reality is merely a manifestation of consciousness is condemned by Sankara by pointing out the difference between the purely imaginary world of dieam and the concrete world of sense perception. There he maintains that the difference in the psychic ideas are intelligible only on the supposition that the psychic images are direct effects of a permanent object in reality. This faith in the reality of the external world which he employs in refuting the Buddhistic metaphysics, he drops out completely when he tries to propound his own theory of Maya according to which the whole of the external reality is converted into a dream world of unreality This particular doctrine of Sankara is incompatible with the Jaina metaphysics. The origin of the concrete world—The popular view as to the origin of the Concrete World that it is due to the creative activity of an Ishwara is rejected by Jaina philosophy. It is also rejected by Sankhya, Yoga and Mimamasa systems of thought. Sankara also rejects this theory when he criticises the Vaiseshika system and the Pasuptha system. The concrete world from the creator or an Ishwara as a result of his creative Will is thus completely discarded by Sankara also. He maintains that it is a result of the manifestation of the ultimate reality, Brahman. In order to establish this doctrine that the world is the result of the manifestation of the Brahman he elaborately discusses the Sankhya view of deriving cosmos from Prakriti, the Achetana root cause of the concrete world according to the Sankhya school. Sankhyas and the Jainas staunchly

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406