Book Title: Samayasara OR Nature of Self
Author(s): A Chakravarti
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 195
________________ 32 SAMAYSARA intimately related to the soul as its own body or indirectly related to the soul as one's own wealth and property In any case, identifying one's Self with these material objects is but a mark of the lack of knowledge as to the real nature of things But if you say that the soul and the physical objects are not so very different in nature as to exclude all possible relations between the two, then you have to remember that your view would be in conflict with the Divine Word of the Sarvajña, or the Omniscient According to the pravachana, the soul is fundamentally different in nature from Pudgala (matter) Its nature is characterised by perfect knowledge and perfect perception, whereas matter is non-living, achetana, a characteristic which is contradictory to that of the soul With such an incompatability of nature, how can they be reasonably identified with each other? If your predication, “This is mine” is maintainable, it must be only on this condition, which is impossible, viz , that the soul can be transmuted into matter and matter into the soul It is clear that the author addresses a deluded person, (bahır-ātman) who is incapable of discriminating between soul and matter, and points out to him the fundamental differences between the two It is the clear perception of this difference, viveka jñana that forms the foundation of Right Faith Next the author states the possible defects which may be pointed out against the view that the Self and the body are absolutely distinct from each other जदि जीवो ण सरीर तित्थयरायरियसथुदी चेव । सव्वावि हवदि मिच्छा तेण दु आदा हवदि देहो ॥२६॥ Jadi jivo na sariram titthayarāyeriya-santhudu cheva Savvā vi havadı michchā tena du ādā havadı deho - (26) यदि जीवो न शरीर तीर्थकराचार्यसस्तुतिश्चैव ।। सर्वापि भवति मिथ्या तेन तु आत्मा भवति देह ॥२६॥ 26 If the soul is not the body then the hymns praising (the bodily excellence, răpastava, of) the Tirthankara or the Achārya will all be false Therefore the soul must indeed be the body COMMENTARY The Titthankara as distinguished from Siddha has a body

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406