Book Title: Samayasara OR Nature of Self
Author(s): A Chakravarti
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 86
________________ INTRODUCTION 1xxxv some European scholars never secured a good following. This view of European scholars cannot be accepted. Though at present there are no representatives of the Sankhya school still we have evidence to show that in earlier period of Indian history about the time of Gunaratna there were a number of devotees professing the Sankhya faith Therefore it is not quite accurate to state that Kapıla "Left no traditions and found no school” (David's Sankhya Karikas ) In Gunaratna's commentary we find the following introductory note to the chapters on Sankhya. “In order to distinguish who the Sankhyas are I mean to describe certain of their characteristic marks and habits of dress They carry three sticks but some of them carry only one They all had red-coloured clothes and carried with them deerskins, as their asanas. Whenever they met each other they saluted nomonarayana which would be returned narayanaya 'namaha. These were called Parivrajakas.” From this description we have to admit that at one time there were a large number of Sankhya ascetics, in the country which belied obrta dicta of the Orientalists who believe that there were no school of the Sankhyas. Most probably these Parivrajakas were absorbed into the general Hindu fold as was suggested From the characteristic salutation referred to by Gunaratna we can infer that Sankhya Parivrajakas had something to do with the growth of modern Vaishnavism which is a result of several tendencies of Thought. I. The Upanishadic doctrine of Brahman which is closely allied to the Sankhya doctrine of Purusha or Alman. (2) The Vasudeva cult and the traditions which have grown around the Yadava prince Krishna. (3) The traditions associated with the Pre-Ramanuja period represented by the alwars of the South. From Tamil litej ature two things are quite evident (1) The great alwars—the religious devotees of the Dravidian country were worshippers of Narayana (2) The earliest Tamil reference Tolkapyam speaking about the religious faiths. It is impossible for us to say with any amount of exactitude when the Krishna cult came to the South. This much we can assert that it must be several centuries before the Christian era much earlier than the introduction of Buddhism. This suggestion is borne out by


Page Navigation
1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406