Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 61 Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Charles E A W Oldham, S Krishnaswami Aiyangar, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarka Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 33
________________ FEBRUARY, 1932) THE INTERROGATIVE BASES OF DRAVIDIAN over 60 lb. would however make a heavy load for a porter, and the suggestion could not be extended to the larger Agra maund, or to that found east of the Meghna. For these maunds of 40 lb. an upwards, there is a possibility that what we are dealing with was originally the contents of a donkey's pannier. We have seen above that in the mountainous country the commonest units of weight were called 'donkey-loads,' and a pannier, or half-load, would there be somewhere about 80 lb. The hill-donkeys are however a larger and stronger breed than those usually found in the plains, and ought to be able to carry substantially more. I can hear of no case of donkeys now being used for regular transport in the plains; in brick-fields, and for short journeys in northern India, they are expected to carry as much as a maund in each pannier, but this is certainly gross overloading, and nothing like so much could be carried for long marches on successive days, when a total load of round about 100 lb. would be reasonable. It may be noted that Dr. Pran Nath in the work already quoted mentions (p. 77) a unit named kharuár in Sanskrit ; but I have been unable to find out when, or where, this unit was used, and the possibility that it may be the Persian kharwar in Sanskrit guise cannot be excluded. These guesses would capry us back to a very early period, before the ox and the camel had become the principal carriers of India, and when the usual agents were porters, supple. mented in some localities by donkeys. My object in offering them is merely to ask if such & period has left any traces in literature, and if there is anything to show that donkeys were in fact used for transport in regions where the maunds were comparatively large. For all I know, the donkey may have been important before the arrival of the Aryans, and the existing contempt for a most serviceable animal may be a survival of the Aryan disdain of unfamiliar institutions : at any rate, his history may deserve more attention than it has hitherto received. THE INTERROGATIVE BASES OF DRAVIDIAN. By L. V. RAMASWAMI AIYAR, M.A., B.L. (MAHARAJA'S COLLEGE, ERNAKULAM.) (Continued from p. 4.) The fact that Telugu and some of the central Dravidian dialects show é in cases where Tamil and Kannada show a need not be held to prove that the latter was not original. The true and the only test in such instances would be to consider what, after an analysis of the cognates of the words given above, would emerge as the reconstructed bases, and if these latter show a instead of e, there can be little doubt about the original character of a. In the parallel cases cited above, the fact that the source-bases show a would tend to demonstrate that in all these d should be considered to be original. The question now arises, why and how these forms took on y before them; for, there is little doubt that as Dravidian does not tolerate original initial y, this y should be considered secondary. It will already have been noted that in the above instances the correspondence between Telugu & and Tamil & exista only where the latter alternates with w. This taken along with the fact already demonstrated above, that a should have been original, would furnish us with the clue to the origin of y before a. & in these instances probably developed a palatal tonality at a particular stage of Dravidian when the palatal glide became incorporated; and this glide became permanently written and uttered in Tamil as a fricative, while in Telugu and in some instances in Kai and in Tamil, yd changed into &. That the palatal tonality was not developed in all dialects and in all instances of forme with &- in Tamil itself, is shown by (a) the occurrence in ancient Tamil of alternative forms for yddu, etc., containing an initial d with a distinct non-palatal tonality (as attested by the actual sound-value now given to them) andPage Navigation
1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 ... 428