________________
Studies in Jainology, Prakrit
151
REFERENCES AND NOTES
in
s
Paper presented at the All India Seminar (Mysore University) Mysor, 1975 and published in the Glory of India, Vol.III-3, 1979. Prof.Lalchand Jain has discussed this problem of the date of Acarya Kundakunda at length. Vide Tulasi Prajñā Vol.I]I-1, pp. 7-15. As proposed by Pt.Kailas Chandra Shastri, Vide Ibid. Intro. to Pancāstikāya, Arrah 1920. Bharatiya Sanskriti mem Jainadharma kā Yogadāna, Bhopal, 1962, p.83. (i) Intro. to Pravacanasāra, Bombay 1935. (ii) Laler he accepted Dr.P.B.Desai's findings, as I learnt in the course of my personal discussion with him. Jainism in South India and Some Jain Epigraphs, Sholapur, 1957, pp.152-57. Ibid., p.16. Vide Ibid, pp.156-57. (i) Some scolars like Dr.Upadhye do not accept the Rayanasāra as the genuine work of Kundakundācārya Vide his Intro. to Parayanasāra. (ii) Some scholars like Dr.H.L.Jain and Shri Phulchand Shastri attribute the authorship of the Mulācāra to this grcal teacher. Some others do not accept it. Pl.Premi discusses this problem at pretty length and comes to the conclusion that the Mūlacăra can be the work of Vattakera and not of Kundakunda. Vide Jaina- Sahitya aur luihāsa, Bombay 1956, pp.548-53.
7.
si
ai
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
