________________
380
Studies in Jainology, Prakrit
54.
55.
Relationship of Indo-Aryan and Dravidian Languages', Ph.D.Thesis, accepted on 8- 12-1955, by the Karnatak
University, p.250. 53. Op.cit., p.67.
Ibid, p.68. Vidc A.N.Narasimhiya, 'A Grammar of the Oldest Kannada Kannada Inscriptions, Mysore 1941, pp.1-2.
Op.cit. 57. BUR-EMN, 1381 Ka. A notc is also added: ‘CI. Turner
S.V.ghurko’. Vide Op.cit., Intro.9. 58. (i) Op.cit.
(ii) It may be noted that the 1A line of decent, here, starts with the desi (or dhātvadesa) ghuttai, with no Sanskrit or
Pali or Prakrit cognale form prcccding it. 59. Vide Prof.C.R.Sankaran, Some Problems in Kannada
Linguistics, Kannada Research Institutc Dharwar, 1954, pp.59-60. (i) Vide Dr.S.K.Chatterji, Op.cit., p.92. (ii) At present I have no means of finding out the Austric cognates of the root. Op.cit. (i) BUR-EMN, 2665 Ka. (ii) SMD Dh. (tiripu). Siddha-Hema, IV.115. Kittel, Op.cit. BUR-EMN, 2685-Ka. A note also is added:
“Cf.Pk.tuppa-ghee, Mar. tup-id”. 66. Vide Dr.S.K.Chatterji, Op.cit. pp.94-95. Dr.Chatterji notes
that the phenomenon of Polyglottism in MIA is illustrated by what may be called Translation Compunds. He further observes; "The occurrence of this kind of translation compounds suggests that in ancient India, as much as in Modern India, various languages were spoken (or studied
or otherwise employed) side, by side, and hence tese Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
