Book Title: Studies in Indian Philosophy
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 52
________________ A note on Attā Not only is it of interest to find Buddhist and Jain text giving a similar argument when rejecting the atman theory, but it is also helpful as a means of assessing exactly what sort of ātman the Buddha was rejecting in the the AS. The Jains differ from the Buddists in that they do believe in a personal ātman, although not an unchanging one The ātman being rejected in the Sūyagadamga is therefore the world-ātman. The close similarity of the two arguments makes it clear that the Buddha in the AS is not merely refuting the indiviual ātman, but also the concept of the world-ātman. It is noteworthy that the argument used by the Buddha in the AS to refute the idea of a world-attā form part of the proof put forward in the Anattalakkhaņasutta,” traditionally the second sermon he preached after the enlightenment, to show that the five khandhas are unattā non-atta'.13 In that sermon he states : Material form (rūpa) is non-attā, for if it were attā then it would not be conducive to disease and we should have complete mastery over it'. Similarly for the other khandhas. He continues : 'Is rūpa eternal or non-eternal ? Is something which is non-eternal pleasant or unpleasant ? Is it right to regard something which is non-eternal, unpleasant to change as " That is mine, I am that, that is my attā” ? As in the AS, the Buddha's ability to reject the idea that the khandhas are attā depends upon his audience knowing that attā is, by difinition, nicca and sukha If it were, then we should not suffer disease (which is dukkha), and if the rūpa, etc., were atta then it would be 'ours' and we should have full control over it. All this proves that the khandhas are not attā, they are anatta 'non-attā'. The same argument that something is anatta because it is non-eternal is also seen in the Chachakka-sutta, 13 where the Buddha states : “If anyone should say that eye, etc., is attā, then that is not fitting, for the coming into existence of eye, and its passing away, is seen. Since it is not fitting AS-4 and and Subjecu Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352