Book Title: Studies in Indian Philosophy
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 55
________________ 28 Studies in Indian Philosophy and 'other'. !f we have to translate attā as 'self in these contexts, then for the sake of consistency we must do the same elsewhere. To distinguish it from the normal reflexive use of 'self' for attā, which is, of course, widely used in Pāli, we should rather adopt the translation 'permanent self' for the individual attā whose existence the Buddha rejected. As E. J. Tho nas states, 27 in the Anattalakkhana-sutta the Buddha does not specifically deny the existence of the attā. The sutta is merely a denial that the khandhas were ātman, whatever that term means. It may be true to say that the Buddha does not specifically deny the existence of the atta anywhere in the Pāli canon, in the sense that he does not state explicitly 'The attā does not exist. As stated above, however, in the AS he does speak of the men who grieves over the loss of his attā as grieving about something which does not exist internally. He also draws attention to the folly of someone who holds the view that the world and the attā are the same if it can be shown that attā and some thing nging to attā are not to be found, and he then goes on to prove to the satisfaction of his audiance that they are not to be found. I think it is correct to conclude that by implication, if not explicitly, the Buddha denied the existence of the permanent individual self Notes the peale Servicios de e sti 1 Abbreviations of Pāli texts are those adopted by the Critical Pali Dictionary (=CPD). Editions quoted are those of the Pali Text Society. Cties-commentaries. 2 MI 130-42. 3 The Pāli word attă is usually translated as either ‘self' or 'soul. I leave it untranslated here, but try to decide between the two at the end of this article. 4 I think E. J. Thomas is too cautious when he states: There may be here some reference to upanishadic doctrine, though it is still not the identity of self and Brahma' (History of Buddhist Thought, London 1933, p. 103). Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352