Book Title: Studies in Indian Philosophy
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 216
________________ Indian aesthetic terminology 189 accepted ethical norms and not sensualists. This stand is by no means a vindication of the autonomy of art; it is a servile submission to the dictates of orthodoxy. It is once again in Kumārila that we are able to trace the origin of this compromising attitude. He observes that even Vālmīki and Vyāsa deserve to claim our attention only because of their loyalty to Vedic scriptures : "Vedaprasthānābhyāsena hi Vālmıki-Dvaipā yanaprabhịtibhiḥ tathaiva svavākyāri pranitāni”. (Tantravāritika, Iji.7. Ben, Edn. p. 16) This is all right so far as religious art or literature is concerned; but what about secular art? Has it no place in the Indian scheme of things ? Is not beauty or aesthetic value an end in itself? Europe had to await the dawni of Renaissance and Reformation before humanism could assert itself in all directions. But in India, even before the Christian era, Kautilya in his Arthaśāstra and Bharata in his Natyaśāstra upheld the autonomy of the secular values of arth (political power) and kāma (sensual pleasure) even like the first framers of the Kāmaśāstra anterior to Vātsyāyana. In popular folk-literature represented by Hāla's Gāthāsaptaśati and Guņādhya's Bịhatkathā, we have ample room for extra-marital love-affairs and adventurous careerists, a tradition which continued in the later Daśakumāracarita of Dandin and the still later Suka-saptati. In the field of lyric too, rank eroticism characterises Mayūra's asļaka as well as Amaru's Sataka. In the genre of drama, we have bawdy bhānas and obsene prahasanas produced as late as the 18th century. Though all these may be regarded as exceptioos to the general rule of conformity to ethical norms, the question remains whether they deserve to be rated as artistic, exclusively by their aesthetic value. Only two theorists have attempted their defence in all seriousness. One is Rājasekhara whose facetious or specious argument is that even Vedic texts are tarred with same brush and hence poetry should not be singled out for attack. The second is Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352