Book Title: Studies in Indian Philosophy
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 255
________________ 228 Studies in Indian Philosophy in the province of poetry. Bhãmaha's whole treatment of this topic is novel, interesting and illuminating and deserves to be read in the original.11 He first defines and illustrates the two pramānas, pratijñā, its dosas, betu and hetvābhāsas, dịşțānta and drstāntābhāsa, dūsana and dūsaņābhāsa as set forth in the Science of Logic. Then he treats of pratijñā, pratijñābhāsa, hetu and hetu-dosas and dpstānta, its varieties in accordance with Loka-vyavabāra and as found in poetry. From Bhāmaba's treatment of nyāya in accordance with the sāstras and in accordance with the 'loka' (or loka-vyavahāra) it is clear that in the province of poetry he does not insist on the strict, rigid or rigorous form in respect of anumāna, and its members like pratijñā, hetu, and dřstānta. This Bhā. maha's stand would seem to be perfectly reasonable. Śri San. kuka, one of the commentators of Bharata's Nāțyaśāstra, when explaining the famous rasa-sūtra assigns a major role to anumiti or anumāna. 19 Abhinavagupta, who vehemently criticises the anumāna theory recognises the importance of laukika anumāna in the equipment of a sahỉdaya.18 Some of the Sanskrit thinkers unhesitatingly accept the alamkāras like Kāvyalinga and anumāna. 14 The thinkers who approvingly quote "Citraturaga-nyāya' or 'maņi-pradīpa-prabhā-dịşțānta' in explaining the process of rasa experience, who sing of the glories of the unique nature of poetic creation, and who accept āhārya-jñāna as the very basis of the various figures of sense should have, in fact, unhesitatingly accepted Kāvyāpumāna or laukikānumāna as the source of the additional sense, the so-called suggested sense. These thinkers ungrudgingly accept Kāvya-pratyakṣa as advocated by Bhāmaba but vehemently criticise the Kāvyāpumāna as the source of revealing the additional sense. This ardhajaratiya won't do. Mahimabhatta's view that there is no need to postulate a new-fangled vịtti called vyañjanā and the new theory of dhvani as their purpose is perfectly served by apumāna (of course, Kāvyānumāna) deserves a more sympathetic and dispassionate consideration at the hands of the Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352