Book Title: Studies in Indian Philosophy
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 231
________________ 204 Studies in Indian Philosophy terms. This clearly indicates that Bharata did not intend to use these terms indiscriminately. In spite of this clear distin. ction Abhinavagupta repeatedly says that Nātya is poetry. Kāvyam Natyameva. 14 This clearly shows that while writing his famous commentary on Nāțyasāstra, Abhinavagupta did not have the same concern with the staging of drama (Prayoga) as did Bharata. It is necessary at this stage, to dilate further on the meaning of Natyā. Abhinavagupta himself defines Nāļya as follows : Yattu dasarūpakam tas ya yo arthah tadeva nātyam. 15 That is the 'Artha'16 of Dasarūpaka is nātya. This definition, though in a sense correct, is very ambiguous and is likely to be misused, unless the primary meaning of 'natya' is borne in mind. The object or Visaya'17 of Dasarūpaka may change inasmuch as the artistic medium changes. If the medium is word or ordinary language, this object could be easily identified with poetry; Nāļya would thus be equated with poetry. This is what Abhinavagupta is trying to do. It appears to me that he wrongly quotes from Nāțyaśāstra in supporting his point. He says : “ Yat vaksyate - Nāțyasya eşā tanuh". The chapter from which this passage is taken, really deals with the importance of speech in acting. Separated fro.n its context, the quotation 18 is likely to be misleading. The passage runs thus : Yo vāgabhinayah prokto mayā pūrvam dvijottamāh, Lakşaņam tasya vakşyāmi svaravyañjanasambhavam. vāci yatnastu kartavayo, Natyasyeyam tanus smịtā anga-nepathya-tattvāni vākyārtham vyañjayanti hi.19 To use this passage for proving that Natya is the same as kāvya is, therefore, not quite fair. It is much better to define Nāțya as Anukarana, following Bharata as I have done. It appears to me that Abhinavagupta and R. S. Ramaswami Shastri, the learned editor of Abhinavabhāratia • are both wrong in insisting that Nātya should not be defined as Anukarana.91 Once, however, the distinctiveness of the medium that is employed in Nātya is recognised it can easily be seen Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352