Book Title: Studies in Indian Philosophy
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 150
________________ Circularity in the inductive justification.. 123 there is an excellent non-Indologists' introduction to anumāna by a well-known logician-philosopher. 13 On NCE, see PNT, III, Sūtras 7 and 8. pp. 181 ff, Sūtra 10 and the commentary in PNT, pp. 192 and 200. 14 Roughly synonymous with udāharana. PNT p. III, 181ff and p. 216. 15 PNT, I discuss this in VI, however, such lack of doubt (samsaya) is freedom from faulty superimposition (samaropa) PNT, Sūtras 9, 11 and 13, pp. 37-48, with a similar lack of illusion (vipar yāya) PNT, pp. 37ff and inattention (anadh yavasāya ) PNT, p. 48; confidence or certain knowledge (vyavasà ya or nirnaya), PNT, chapter I, is generated, the purpose of which is to allow us to accept the agreeable and discard the disagreeable, PNT, Sūtra 2, pp. 13 and 33 and Sūtra 3, p. 22 and 'agreement with the knowable' (avyabhicaritam prame yam ), Chapter 1, S. 18, p. 73. Thus, removal of doubt yields certainty, that is, v yavasāya and constitutes verifiability. 16 See Part V. Argument. + 3 (p. 183-184). 17 PNT. the legitimacy of pratyaksa (perception) is dependent on the legitimacy of anumana (inference), pp. 183, 191. 18 PNT, ch. I, Sūtra 19, p. 174. 19 Obviously I did not reverse the order of the parārthanūmäna to con form to moderm formalistic expectations; that reversal generates certain crucial metalogical difficulties which, altogether not directly relevant here, are detailed in my article Metalogical Incompatibilities in the Formal Description of Buddhist Logic', see note 1. p. 186. 20 PNT. p. 182. 21 '?' is very roughly equivalent, in my simple use here, to the English if...then," Sanskrit "yat.. tat." 22 P. F. Strawson, An Introduction to Logical Theory (Oxford, 1952), p. 256ff...=ILT. 23 Ibid., 257. 24 But only in most cases, not in all. See my remarks on the restricted rules of legitimacy and substitution inherent in the fallacies (abhasa ) where there are nonempirical, but logically prior incompatible metaphysical Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352