Book Title: Studies in Indian Philosophy
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 149
________________ 122 Studies in Indian Philosophy in the future. So you are assuming what you are trying to prove to me. I do mean that when you have to use the general rule to prove that (first, the general rule if two things going together in the past, and so on) is a good rule to use, you have to use it in order to prove that, (second), that is, two things such as smoke and fire constantly occurring together is a good reason to forecast their occurring so in the future, just as the general rule states. A. So what? it is the only game in town. What else can I show you ? God ? B. No, there are too many conflicting claims about too many different gods. That does not help here. Well, then, this general rule about two things occurring together, and so on, is the only "proof” I know. B. Yes. But I want real proof, a guarantee of what will happen. : A. So would I, but who can guarantee what has not yet happened ? Evidence of what happened in the past is all we have from which to predict the future. B. But don't you feel insecure now ? I do. A. No, because this kind of "proof” is all we have ever had. The world has not changed by knowing this, only your naive attitude about certainty has changed. I can feel just as secure with these rules as I can with anything. B. I guess so (!). 12 a See PNT, Chapter III, pp. 187ff. The general Indian schema (it is not an Aristotelian "syllogism") may be exemplified below in a drastically simplified (and overworked) example. Pratiñā : (Thesis) “X (locus) has fireness (the property of fire)" Hetu (Justification) “because of smokeness” Drsțânta (Exemplification) "wherever there is fireness there is smokness." Sapaksa “as in a kitchen." Vipaksa (and) “not as in a lake.” For the reader unfamiliar with Indian logic and the sizable scholarly literature on it, one might peruse the introductory article on "Buddhist ormal Logic” by D D. Daye in Buadhism : A Modern Perspective. ed. C. Prebish (Pennsylvania State University Press, 1974). In I. M. Bocheński's A History of Formal Logic, (Notre Dame, 1961), pp. 416-447 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352