Book Title: Studies in Indian Philosophy
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 88
________________ Negation : Some Indian theories 61 Let us consider the in junction na bhakşayet 'he shall not cat'. It is said that this type of injunction should not be translated as he shall not eat, but as 'he shall not eat. This injunction does not prescribe an action different from eating. It simply prohibits eating. If the positive injunction bhaksayet 'he shall eat' is symbolized by 'N[F(x)]', where 'N' stands for the obligation operator, then its negation would be symbolized by 'N ~[F(x)]'. This type of negation is called 'pras. ajya-pratisedha' or 'nişedha' type of negation. In this context it is to be noted that the negative injuction has not been symbolized by' ~N[F(x)]' but by 'N ~[F(x))'. In standard deontic modal logic '~N[F(x)]' would be equivalent to ‘P ~[F(x)}', where 'P' stands for the permissibility operator. So '~N[F(x)]' would not express a negative injuction. Now let us discuss whether negations of the form ‘N[ ~ F(x)] or 'N[F(-X)]' are permissible according to the Mimāņsā philosophers. According to these philosophers all cases of negation other than prasajya-pratişedha which is symbolized by the form 'N [F(x)]', are called "paryudāsa' 'exclusion' type of negation. It is also said that the paryudāsa 'exclusion type of negation is to be understood where the negative is connected either with the verbal root or with the noun, and the prasajya-pratişedha 'prohibition' type of negation is to be understood where the negative is connected with the verbal ending. In the injunction nekşeta 'he shall not look', the 'not is attached to the verb or the verbal root. Hence the sentence nekseta should be translated as 'he shall not-look’, and this type of negation is to be considered as a paryudāsa 'exclusion' type of negation. In this case the injunction positively prescribes something other than looking This type of negation can be symbolized by the form 'N[~ F(x)]'. Now let us consider the injunctions where a noun is negated. As an example of this type of negation the Mimāmsā philosophers have discussed the injunction nānuyājesu ye-yajāmaham karoti at the after-scrifices he shall not say Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352