Book Title: Studies in Indian Philosophy
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 139
________________ 112 Studies on Indian Philosophy humanly possible (since few of us have sarvajñatva) within the available and relevant epistemological intersubjective sou. rces (pramāņas) at hand for each of us. Therefore, if the con. tent of a given tarka statement refers to such relations as "where there is smoke, there is fire,” where, for all things "x," where there is smoke x there is a fire x, or, (x) (sX fx), in which cognitions are confined to one or more specific pramāņas, then the range of possible instances of the specific tarka search for counter examples is confined to the range of those field-dependent possible cogntions; that is, one does pot look for smoke without fire in a lake. Thus for a “good”, conclusive tarka argument, one should be able to say that one has fully exhausted the search for counter examples in one's tarka vyāpti justifications But the noncontroversial criteria for judging that one has searched exhaustively (a) presuppose the methods at issue here and (b) are empirically impossible to attain. Thus the conviction that one has an exhaustive search may be psychologically convincing but its completeness will remain empirically undemonstrated. That is in case no counter cxamples are found and further justifications for the NCE grounds of turka are still requested, one must simply suggest that there are finite limits to the range of inter subjective experiences within which the legitimacy and probability of one's tarka-statements-being-true are humanly capable of being confirmed. The nonexhaustive absence of counter exam. ple is then claimed to be a sufficient condition for accepting the specific vyāpti in question in the NCB authorization argument. 16 Furthermore, the tarka generalization generated from NCE seems to reprsent merely simple enumeration. This is a simple type of inductive generalization which can be refuted by one specific counter example. If one is not forthcoming after an exhaustive search, one may hold (as do the Jainas) that the specific tarka claim of vyāpti is to be accepted. Then the authorized vyāpti is made the content of the application of the general drstānata-warrant to a specific inference schema Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352