Book Title: Sambodhi 2003 Vol 26
Author(s): Jitendra B Shah, N M Kansara
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 41
________________ Vol. XXVI, 2003 DOCTRINE OF KARMA : A SCIENTIFIC VIEW.... What is The Jaina Doctrine Of Karma ? In a few words, the Jaina Doctrine of Karma may be summed up as a theory that lays down that a person, or a living being in general, has to reap the fruits of his actions or accept the inevitable retribution of his actions - good or bad. "There is no escape from the results of own actions', it says.2 Good and pious actions yield pleasurable fruition and the bad and sinful actions painful ones. Jaina Karma Theory is unique in its evolution to mathematical precision. This paper, with its limited scope, hardly brings out this perfection of the karma Theory as seen and propounded by the Lords Tirthankaras and propagated by the masters and preceptors down the ages. 'Karma' is important, from the mundane point of view as it is responsible for all mundane pleasures and pains of the living beings and from the spiritual point of view, because it is a constant companion to all worldly souls and unless this association between the karma and the soul is completely and irresidually ended Moksa (liberation : the ultimate goal) remains unattainable. In the Jaina parlance, the term 'Karma' has two meanings - 1. Any mental, verbal or physical action and 2. The karma-matter (matter of the Karma pudgala varganā) that comes in contact with the soul and sticks to it as a result of the action. This needs certain getting used to and this paper endeavours to clarify this aspect The Importance Of Karma Theory - Here, I would like to cite a couplet from the famous story of Samarāditya by the eighth century AD Jaina master, Acārya Haribhadrasūrī. It reads as follows "Savvam puvvakayānam kammānam pāvae phalavivāgam Avarāhesu gunesu ya, nimittamettaṁ paro hoi ||” It supports the inherent theory of the Doctrine of Karma, when it says that 'everyone receives the due and natural retribution of one's own actions; in favour of or disfavour, or in his pleasurable and painful experiences, the other is just a means, an intermediary agency and not the substantive cause'. Pleasure and pain are, thus, not given by someone else but are obtained as a result of one's own actions done at some point of time in the past. For everything that we experience there are substantive causes and there are intermediary agencies. Generally, we don't distinguish between the two and attribute the actions of the intermediary Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184