Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 37 Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 32
________________ 26 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY. (FEBRUARY, 1908. defeated a border chief, named Sophagasenos or Subhāgasens, and levied a contribution of elephants from him. It was under Demetrios that permanent conquests seem to have been made in India; because Kharoşthi legends appear for the first time on Greek coins during the reign of Demetrios. There is, also, a coin of Demetrios which seems to be the result of a compromise between the Greek and Indian methods of coinage. The regular type of the Greek system is retained, but the coin is of the square Indian form. When Demetrios was absent in India, Eukratidas, one of his officers whom he most probably left in charge of Bactria, usurped his throne, and all attempts on the part of Demetrios to recover the province were of no avail. At this time, along with the coins of Demetrios, occur those of several other Greek princes, such as Antimnakos, Pantaleon, Agathokles, etc. Eukratidas seems to bave reigned in Bactria up to 160 B. C. He also conducted Beveral expeditions against Demetrios and seems to have subjugated him in the end. Eukratidas was murdered by one of his sons on return from one of his Indian expeditions. During the later years of Eukratidas, civil strife seems to have been rife in his dominions in which a rival prince, named Plato, seems to have played a prominent part. On one of the coins of Plato, occurs the date 147 of the Seleukidan era, equivalent to B. O. 165. Eukratidas was succeeded by Heliokles in Bactria, who seems to have been the last Greek ruler of that country. In or about the year 165 B. C., occurred one of the most importaat events in the history of Asia. At this time, & war broke out between two nomad hordes living on the borders of the Chinese Empire, the Yne-chi and the Hiung-Na, in which the former were completely defeated and ousted from their territories. The Yue-chi then marched westward with their flocks and herds in search of new lands and pastures. On their way they fell in with another nomad horde, the Wu-sun. In the fight which ensued, the Wu-sun were worsted and their chief, Nan-teou-mi, was killed. After this, the Yue-chi, still marching westward, attacked the Se or Sok, who abandoned their territories to the Yue-chi and migrated into Ki-pin to the south. Bat in the meantime Kwen-mo, son of the deceased Wu-san Chief, had grown up under the protection of the Hiung-Ny and attacked the Yue-chi to avenge his father's death. He succeeded in driving the Yue-chi out of their newlyacquired lands into Ta-his or Bactria. The Chinese historians derived their knowledge of the migration of the Yue-chi chiefly from the reports of Chang-Kien, who visited the Yue-chi in or about B. C. 125. The next mention of the Yue-chi is in Pan-ku's history of the first Han dynasty. Pan-ku states that the Yue-chi were no longer nomads and that the Yue-chi kingdom had become divided into five principalities, viz.-(1) The Hieou-mi; (2) Chouang-mo; (8) Kouei-chouang : (4) Hi-thun; and (5) Kao-fu. To this the history of the second Han dynasty adds that about a hundred years later, the Kouei-chouang prince, Kieou-tsieoo-kio, attacked and subjugated the other four principalities and made himself master of a kingdom which was called Koeichoang. This prince invaded Parthia and took possession of Kabul. Kiu-tsiu-kio died at the age of eighty, and his son, Yen-kao-chin, ascended the throne. He conquered Tien-tchou (India) and there set up generals who governed in the name of the Yue-chi. Thus it appears, that a few years after the defeat of the Yue-chi by the Hiung-Nu in 165 B. C., Ta-hia or Bactria was over-run by them, while the Se or Sok poured into Afghanistan and the Panjab. From this period onward, the scanty notices of the classical historians, which were of some use to Cunningham and other scholars in their attempt to re-construct the history of the Eastern Greeks, become scantier still and then ceased altogether. E. J. Rapson's Indian Coins, p. 5. • The above account is taken from Mr. V. A. Smith's admirable summary of the notices of the Chinese historiaas in his "Kusban period of Indian History," J. R. 4. &., 1908.Page Navigation
1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 ... 454