Book Title: Kavyanushasana Critical Study
Author(s): A N Upadhye
Publisher: A N Upadhye

Previous | Next

Page 238
________________ And when the cognition of the logical reason - e.g. smokeis erroneous, the inference based on that logical reason will be invalid itself. The inference from mist, taken as smoke, of a reproduction or imitation of fire, is surely unsound. For, a veil of mist, which is an imitation of smoke and is recognized as such, does not legitimize the inference of a heap of red roses, viz., something that reproduces fire. The Theory of Imitation is Vain It may be argued that eventhough the actor is not angry himself, yet he seems angry. True, he resembles a man who is angry. This is resemblance and it is due to a contraction of eye-brows etc., and is like the resemblance between a real ox and another ox-like creature due to the shape of the muzzles etc. In this case, there is no imitation involved. Again, the spectators are not aware of this resemblance. (They are unaware of any resemblance between the actor and the original character, but are aware only of the fact that the actor is in a certain state of consciousness which is also shared by them). The spectators' perception of the actor is with his mental state. Therefore, the theory of imitation or reproduction is after all a vain theory. To say that the audience has the perception "That is Rāma", is not correct. For, if this perception, divested of every doubt during the play is not stultified later on by some subsequent cognition which invalidates it, why is it not a true cognition? And, if it is stultified, why is it not a false cognition? In fact, even when no invalidating cognition appears, it will be always a type of false cognition. (According to Sankuka, the aesthetic experience consists of an imitation; thus he implicitly admits that it is unreal.) Thus Sankuka's contention that this is an experience in which, since it is devoid of any contradictory idea, one cannot distinguish any error, is untrue. Again, the same perception, 'This is Rama', is had in other actors also and hence of Rama, we have only his universal aspect. To say that the Vibhavas can be Jain Education International 213 For Private & Personal Use Only - www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558