________________
Sr. R. G. Bhandarkar Commemorative Volume BORI, Poona, 1917 pp. 375-386.
254 lbid, p. 386.
255
256 Ibid, p. 17.
257
Studies in Ind. Aestetics & Criticism, p. 179. Rājasekhara classifies Haraṇa into avoidable and acceptable. Vide, Ibid, p. 184.
258 lbid, p. 184.
259
Vide Kṣemendra Studies by Dr. Suryakanta, Poona-2, 1954, pp. 50-62. Vide also Dr. S. K. De HSP (II) p. 37, f.n.5 and pp. 292-298 for a general idea of Kaviśikṣa and the literature on it.
253
260
Studies in Sanskrit Sahityaśāstra, 1983, pp. 1-18.
Vide, 'Studies in Sanskrit Sahityaśāstra', pp. 20-23; 24, 26-27. Dr. Kulkarni's essay 'Sanskrit Rhetoricians on Poetic Conventions' is a brilliant, critical exposition of the topic. Vide, Ibid, Chap. 2.
261 lbid, p. 24.
262 Sir R. G. Bhandarkar Vol. BORI, Poona, 1917.
267
263 Vide Dr. S. K. De, HSP (11) pp. 322-25. Also see Dr. K.. Krishnamoorthy, The Dhvanyaloka and its Critics, Chap. VIII, p. 297.
264 The Sahityadarpaṇa, Notes, p. 15.
265 Vide K.A.S., Vol. II, Notes, pp. 32, 33, 38, etc.
266 "Language Thought and Culture", pp. 187, 195.
Aesthetic Rapture, Vol. II, p. 18.
268 The Language Poets Use, p. 69. On Metaphor, see 'Literary Criticism', pp. 69-70, 643-4.
Jain Education International
512
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
