Book Title: Kavyanushasana Critical Study
Author(s): A N Upadhye
Publisher: A N Upadhye

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 360
________________ emphatic, and (2) Paryudāsa, where affirmation is more prominent than negation. Besides, on the basis of the general principle that if a word enters into a compound, it cannot be emphasised, it is laid down that when negation is not compounded it is Prasajyapratişedha and when it is compounded, it is Paryudāsa, However, Vāmana allows compounding in Prasajya pratiședha and hence it cannot be said to be admitted on all hands that whenever Nañ is compounded, it must be Paryudāsa. Hemachandra thinks that the negation in Anuktavān should be emphatic because it is a negation called prasajyapratişedha and so he states that the negative compound in Anuktavān is improper because the negative here is called Paryudāsa (compounded) and it gets connected with the verb. Besides, he adds, by reproducing an argument from the Vyaktiviveka, connected with the verse Samrambhah Karikita... etc. (V.353 in our text, cited to illustrate Avimțstavidheyāṁsadosa in a sentence, p. 245) with the comments (p. 196), that it is not proper to resort to Paryudāsa here because it will prevent the sense from being comprehended or the sense will not fit in. This discussion proceeds apace and forms an interesting intellectual exercise in the Vyaktiviveka (11) (vide Viveka, Qs. 76-77) the discussion regarding the propriety of construction in relation to Uddeśya and Vidheya so as to avoid the Vācyāvacanadoşa comes to an end (vide V.V.11. 94-95; also pp. 431-32) thus : "The predicate should not be stated without stating the subject; for nothing, nowhere can stand stable unless it has found a substratum. This mutual relation of subject and predicate is of the nature of Rūpya-rūpaka; so, in it, the mention of predicate is never proper before a subject." (vide K.A.S., pp. 244-245). Hemachandra goes on to cite the view-point of patañjali, the author of the Mahābhāşya, who has detected the blemish of prominent non-mention of the predicate in Pānini's, sūtra "Vưddhirādaic" because the order of Anuvadya or Uddesya and Vidheya is reversed here. But he defends this reversal on the ground that it signifies an auspicious beginning. 335 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558